129I and 236U distribution in the subpolar North Atlantic unravels water mass provenance in AR7W and A25 lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subpolar North Atlantic (SPNA) is crucial in the global ocean circulation system and one of the few regions where deep convection occurs. The intermediate and deep waters formed in the SPNA have long been investigated, yet their sources and pathways are not fully understood. In this study, we employ a combination of two radionuclide tracers, namely, 129I and 236U, to understand water mass provenance and mixing in the SPNA. The concentrations measured between Portugal and Greenland and across the Labrador Sea in 2020/2021 agreed with previously observed tracer distributions. The highest tracer concentrations were measured in the East Greenland Current (EGC), Denmark Strait Overflow Water (DSOW), and, to a lesser extent, in the eastward-flowing Labrador Sea Water (LSW). In contrast, waters of southern origin such as the North East Antarctic Bottom Water and North East Atlantic Central Water (ENACW) carried comparably smaller amounts of 129I. By using a binary mixing model, we estimated that the EGC contains about 29%–32% of the Polar Surface Water outflowing the Fram Strait. DSOW was mainly derived from 20% to 35% Return Atlantic Water and mixed with LSW. The Iceland Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW) evolved into North East Atlantic Deep Water in the Irminger and Labrador seas primarily by mixing with LSW and, to a lesser extent, with DSOW. The 129I and 236U binary mixing approach was less conclusive for LSW, reaching the current limitation of the model. This study suggests potential benefits and limitations of using 129I and 236U to investigate the mixing and provenance of water masses in the SPNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".