Spin correlations on the pyrochlore lattice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pyrochlores have the chemical formula A₂B₂O₇ with A, B, or both A and B magnetic. It has corner-sharing tetrahedra in the structure, therefore, frustration phenomena naturally occurs in these systems. Because of the frustration, pyrochlore have many interesting properties, including the spin glass in Y₂Mo₂O₇, spin liquid in Tb₂Ti₂O₇, disordered spin ice in Ho₂Ti₂O₇, and ordered spin ice in Tb₂Sn₂O₇. In this thesis we will focus on Tb₂Ti₂O₇. Our goal is to find the spin correlation functions between different sites of Tb ions. The Hamiltonian of Tb ions is an anisotropic nearest neighbour exchange interaction. We apply perturbation theory to the Hamiltonian, and it will separate the Hamiltonian into two parts. The unperturbed part of Hamiltonian is the spin ice Hamiltonian, and other parts of the Hamiltonian are perturbative. The perturbative parts of Hamiltonian can be written in the local coordinates to give three different terms X₂, X₃, X₄. In order to find the spin correlation function, we calculate time dependent spin operators in the interaction picture. Then we apply them to the unperturbed and perturbed terms of Hamiltonian to calculate the spin correlation functions. Finally, we discuss the neutron scattering experiment and how to apply it to test our results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it