Structure and kinematics of the interacting group NGC 5098/5096
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most galaxies in the Universe are found in groups, which have various morphologies and dynamical states. Studying how groups evolve is an important step for our understanding in both large-scale structure formation and galaxy evolution. We analysed the system composed by two groups at z = 0.037, NGC 5098, a group dominated by a pair of elliptical galaxies, and NGC 5096, a compact system which appears to be interacting with NGC 5098. We aim to describe its current dynamical state in order to investigate how it fits in our current cosmological framework. Our analysis is based on deep Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT/MegaCam) g and r imaging, archival Chandra X-ray data, and publicly available data of the galaxy redshift distribution. We model the surface brightness of the 12 brightest galaxies in the field-of-view and investigate the diffuse intragroup light that we detect. With a redshift sample of 112 galaxies, we study the dynamical states of both groups. We detect low surface brightness diffuse light associated with both galaxy-galaxy interactions and a possible group-group collision. The substructure we found in velocity space indicates a past interaction between both groups. This is further corroborated by the X-ray analysis. We conclude that NGC 5098 and NGC 5096 form a complex system, that may have collided in the past, producing a sloshing observed in X-rays and a large scale diffuse component of intragroup light as well as some important tidal debris.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".