Data from: Cretaceous amber inclusions illuminate the evolutionary origin of tardigrades
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supplementary files to the "Cretaceous amber inclusions illuminate the evolutionary origin of tardigrades" paper which include All raw files from the phylogenetic analysis (i.e., t, p, and tree files fromMrBayes, output tree from ASTRAL and IQTree, mcmc files from MCMCTree, and tre and log files from BEAST), RScripts used, and assembled Actinarctus doryphorus genome. Tardigrades are a diverse phylum of microscopic invertebrates widely known for their extreme survival capabilities. Molecular clocks suggest that tardigrades diverged from other panarthropods before the Cambrian, but their fossil record is extremely sparse. Only the fossil tardigrades Milnesium swolenskyi (Late Cretaceous) and Paradoryphoribius chronocaribbeus (Miocene) have resolved taxonomic positions, restricting the availability of calibration points for estimating for the origin of this phylum. Here, we revise two crown-group tardigrades from Canadian Cretaceous-aged amber using confocal fluorescence microscopy, revealing critical morphological characters that resolve their taxonomic positions. Formal morphological redescription of Beorn leggi reveals that it features Hypsibius-type claws. We also describe Aerobius dactylus gen. et sp. nov. based on its unique combination of claw characters. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that Beo. leggi and Aer. dactylus belong to the eutardigrade superfamily Hypsibioidea, adding a critical fossil calibration point to investigate tardigrade origins. Our molecular clock estimates suggest an early Paleozoic diversification of crown-group Tardigrada and highlight the importance of Beo. leggi as a calibration point that directly impacts estimates of shallow nodes. Our results suggest that independent terrestrialization of eutardigrades and heterotardigrades occurred around the end-Carboniferous and Lower Jurassic, respectively. These estimates also provide minimum ages for convergent acquisition of cryptobiosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.239 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".