MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6929714257 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10566511

Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) silveirai Hettiarachchi & Gibbs 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6929714257 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourWhite (mutation)Taxonomy (biology)Ridge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) silveirai sp. nov. Figs. 7, 8C, 8D, 9C, 10C, 11E, 11F, 14, 15 Etymology. This species is named in honour of the late Fernando Silveira (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais) for his contributions to bee taxonomy and his warm, jovial spirit, which made it a delight to attend international conferences on pollinators. Holotype. USA — California • ♀; San Luis Obispo Co., La Panza Camp.; [35.3539° N, 120.2625° W]; elev. 660 m.; 25 April 1968; J. Powell leg.; UCRC GIBBS-11595. [Verbatim label: La Panza Camp., S.L.O. Co., Calif IV-25-68 // J. Powell Collector // Lasioglossum GIBBS-11595 // Holotype/ Lasioglossum (Sphecodogastra) silveirai Hettiarachchi and Gibbs] Paratypes. USA — California • 1 ♀; Monterey Co., 3 air mi. NE of Paloma Creek; [36.3036° N, 121.4118° W]; elev. 274 m.; 06 May 1975; J. Powell leg.; ex Ranunculus; EMEC • 1 ♀; Monterey Co., Chew’s Ridge; [36.3117° N, 121.5682° W]; elev. 1524 m.; 09 May 1975; J. Powell leg.; EMEC • 3 ♀♀; Monterey Co., Chew’s Ridge nr. White Oak camp; [36.3128° N, 121.5721° W]; elev. 1219.2m.; 08 May 1975; J. Powell leg.; ex Ranunculus; EMEC • 1 ♀; ibid.; 08 May 1975; R. Wharton leg.; ex Ranunculus; EMEC • 1 ♀; ibid.; 08 May 1975; R. Wharton leg.; EMEC • 2 ♀♀; Monterey Co., Chew’s Ridge, Santa Lucia Mts.; [36.3117° N, 121.5682° W]; elev. 1524 m.; 08 May 1975; R. Wharton leg.; ex Pinus; EMEC • 2 ♀♀; Monterey Co., Horse Bridge, 1.5 air mi SW of Arroyo Seco Grd. Sta.; [36.2219° N, 121.4950° W]; elev. 330 m.; 07 May 1975; R. Wharton leg.; EMEC • 1♀; San Benito Co., W side of Pinnacles National Monument; [36.4886° N, 121.2217° W]]; elev. 485 m; 02 Jul 1956; E.G. Linsley leg.; ex Hemizonia lobbii; EMEC • 1 ♀; San Benito Co., 5 mi. SW of Paicines, Limeklin Rd.; [36.6362° N, 121.4186° W]; 24 Mar 1966; R. L. Langston leg.; UCRC • 10 ♀♀; San Benito Co., SW. of Paicines; [36.7286° N, 121.2775° W]; 24 Apr 1968; J. Powell leg.; UCRC • 1 ♀; San Luis Obispo Co., La Panza Camp.; [35.3539° N, 120.2625° W]; elev. 660 m.; 25 Apr 1968; P.A. Opler leg.; ex Rhamnus crocea; UCRC • 1 ♀; ibid.; 25 Apr 1968; J. Powell leg.; UCRC • 3 ♀♀; ibid.; 25 Apr 1968; J. Doyen leg.; ex Rhamnus crocea; UCRC • 2 ♀♀; Ventura Co., Lockwood Valley; [34.7331° N, 119.0958° W]; elev. 1555 m.; 05 May 1959; P.H. Timberlake leg.; ex Phacelia ciliata; UCRC • 2 ♀♀; Ventura Co., Lockwood Valley, nr. Stauffer P.O.; [34.7556° N, 119.0592° W]; elev. 1540 m.; 05 May 1959; P.D. Hurd leg.; ex Euphorbia albomarginata; EMEC. Description Female. Length 5.57 (± 0.34 SD) mm (n=7). Head length 1.51 (± 0.07 SD) mm (n=16). Head width 1.67 (± 0.08 SD) mm (n=16). Wing length 4.11 (± 0.27 SD) mm (n=6). Colouration. Head and mesosoma dark brown to black, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with or without an oily metallic sheen. If they have a metallic sheen, it can be metallic green either with or without a purple tint. Metallic sheen not as prominent compared to the other two species, with nearly 30% of specimens (n=30) lacking the sheen or having a sheen that is not notable (Fig. D). Clypeus apex dark brown. Labrum dark brown. Mandible brown basally, light brown apically with reddish brown apex. Flagellum light brown dorsally, brown ventrally. Pronotal lobe brown to dark brown. Tegula brown. Wing membrane hyaline, faintly dusky, veins with subcosta brown, otherwise honey-coloured. Legs dark brown. Metasoma brown to black, apical margins reddish brown to narrowly testaceous. Pubescence. Setae off-white. Tomentum dense on pronotal angle and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, T2–T3 basolaterally; moderately dense on metanotum anterior margin; scattered on T4–T5; partially obscuring metepisternum. Head and mesosoma with mostly sparse pilosity, composed of highly plumose setae with very short fine setae intermixed. Lateral surface of propodeum with sparse erect setae; plumose patch on anterior dorsal area; very short fine hairs intermixed. Metafemoral scopa with dense plumose hairs. Wing hairs pale. T1 with sparse erect setae. Surface sculpture. Clypeus shiny, becoming weakly imbricate basolaterally; punctures large, irregularly spaced (IS ≤ PD) on apical third, smaller and denser on near basal margin (IS ≤1 PD). Supraclypeal area mostly shiny; punctures sparse medially (IS = 2–4 PD). Paraocular area imbricate to reticulate, becoming shiny laterally; punctures mostly dense (IS ≤ 1 PD) to crowded (IS = 0 PD). Frons punctate-reticulate; punctures crowded (IS = 0 PD) or dense (IS <1 PD). Vertex imbricate laterally, strongly so medially; punctures absent or obscure. Gena shiny dorsally, becoming finely lineate ventrally; punctures fine, sparse (IS = 1–3 PD). Postgena shiny, becoming weakly tessellate posteriorly. Tegula mostly shiny and impunctate except the base. Tegula base imbricate with punctures absent or obscure. Mesoscutum shiny, becoming tessellate to imbricate anteromedially; punctures large and small intermixed, mostly dense on marginally and on median line (IS <1 PD), sparser submedially, becoming shallow and indistinct anteromedially. Punctures mesad of parapsidal line (IS = 2–4 PD) slightly sparser than laterad of parapsidal line (IS = 2–3 PD) and becoming closer near medial line (IS ≤ 1 PD). Mesoscutellum shiny; punctures comparatively smaller than the other two species, dense marginally and on median line (IS ≤ 1 PD), sparser submedially (IS = 1–5 PD), diversopunctate, Metanotum shiny and becoming weakly rugulose laterally, densely punctate medially (IS ≤ 1 PD). Metapostnotum rugae strong, anastomosing, reaching posterior margin; sculpture shiny to imbricate. Preëpisternum rugose. Hypoepimeron shiny, becoming weakly rugulose posteriorly; punctures moderately dense (IS = 1–2 PD), and sometime there are few scattered minute punctures anteriorly. Mesepisternum rugose dorsally and becoming strongly so ventrally; punctures obscure or indistinct dorsally, absent ventrally. Metepisternum ruguloso-lineate dorsally, imbricate ventrally. Propodeum lateral face imbricate anteriorly and dorsally, otherwise tessellate; posterior face tessellate. T1 anterior face shiny, punctures small and very sparse; T1 dorsal surface shiny, becoming weakly coriarious on rim, punctures small, sparse (IS = 1–4 PD), very sparse in large subapicolateral boss, and absent on rim. T2 disc imbricate to coriarious; punctures moderately dense basally (IS = 1–2 PD), becoming sparse apically (IS = 1–3 PD); rim coriarious; rim punctures absent (short hairs present but these not arising from distinct punctures). Structure. Face length/width ratio 0.78 (± 0.01 SD). Eyes convergent below [UOD/LOD ratio 1.06 (± 0.03 SD)]. Clypeus projecting ~60% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.86 (± 0.07 SD). Gena narrower than eye. Protibial spur with apical serrations quite longer than length to width of malus. Inner metatibial spur pectinate, basal branches shorter or subequal to width of rachis (Figs. 11E, 11F). Intertegular span 1.11 (± 0.10 SD) mm. Distance between parapsidal line 0.85 (± 0.08 SD) mm. Pronotal angle obtuse. Mesoscutum length/width ratio 0.87 (± 0.04 SD); mesoscutum/mesoscutellum length ratio 2.83 (± 0.21 SD); mesoscutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.59 (± 0.11 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina very strong. (n=18) Male. Unknown. Range. Coastal Mountains of central California (Figs. 7, 15). Floral hosts. ASTERACEAE: Hemizonia lobbii Greene • BORAGINACEAE: Phacelia ciliata Benth. • EUPHORBIACEAE: Euphorbia albomarginata Torr. & A.Gray • RANUNCULACEAE: Ranunculus sp. • PINACEAE: Pinus sp. • RHAMNACEAE: Rhamnus crocea Nutt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicT-cell and B-cell Immunology→French-language works237,207→