MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929739045 · doi:10.5073/20240521-105349-0

Genome sequence of a European D. coronariae strain

2024· dataset· en· W6929739045 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en Agroenvironnement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterothallicWhole genome sequencingGenomeFungusDNA sequencingPhylogenetic treeStrain (injury)Nanopore sequencingSexual reproductionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fungal pathogen Diplocarpon coronariae, the causal agent of apple blotch, poses a significant challenge in organic apple production and meadow orchards across Europe. One potential measure to restrict the spread of the disease is cultivating resistant varieties. However, understanding the reproduction and pathogenicity of the fungus is crucial for maintaining apple resistance. The recently sequenced Chinese isolate NL1 indicates that secondary metabolites play a role in host colonization. Furthermore, the rapid adaptation of the fungus to environmental conditions, including resistance, depends on sexual reproduction. While the fungus is capable of reproducing both sexually and asexually, in Europe, only asexual reproduction has been observed. The presence of alternative forms (idiomorphs) plays a crucial role in the mating of heterothallic fungi like D. coronariae. Chinese strains have been observed to exhibit the presence of two idiomorphs (MAT1.1 and MAT1.2). At present, no sequence of a European isolate is available for analysis. This study provides the first European draft genome sequence of the D. coronariae strain (DC1_JKI) from Dresden, Germany. The final draft contained 22 scaffolds with a total length of 51.5 Mbp and an N50 of 4.0 Mbp. The BUSCO analysis of genome completeness was 98.5%. Additionally, a second isolate from Japan (NBRC 30405) was sequenced for comparison of the genome. Using long-read sequencing technologies, the DNA from DC1_JKI and NBRC 30405 was sequenced using Oxford Nanopore MinION. To polish the sequences, Illumina NovaSeq sequencing (NovaSeq 6000 S4 PE150 XP) was conducted for short reads. The draft genome sequence was assembled using Canu software, resulting in the genome sequence of DC1_JKI. The data on this platform comprise 20 files. Two genome sequences have been processed. The European assembly is available in the file "genome_DC1_JKI.fasta" and the Japanese assembly in "genome_NBRC30405.fasta". The final European genome sequence was first annotated using BRAKER 1 and BRAKER 2 and the masked genome sequence, detected repetitive elements, genome annotation features, protein sequences and coding sequences are available from this collection (genome.fa.masked.gz, genome.fa.out.gz, genome.fa.tbl.gz, Diplocarpon_coronariae-families.fa.gz, Diplocarpon_coronariae-families.stk.gz, Br2_tsebra.gtf.gz, Br2_tsebra.aa.gz, Br2_tsebra.codingseq.gz). The functional annotation of was performed with InterProScan (interproscan.tsv.gz; interproscan.gff3.gz). GeMoMa pipeline was used to predict gene models using three reference datasets from species of the genus Drepanopezizaceae and two species of the order Helotiales in combination with the incorporation of the annotation from BRAKER1 and BRAKER 2. Finally the protein sequences (Galaxy32-[GeMoMa_NBRC30405_canu].fasta, Galaxy18-[GeMoMa_DC1_JKI].fasta) and the genome annotation features (Galaxy31-[GeMoMa_NBRC30405_canu].gff, Galaxy17-[GeMoMa_DC1_JKI].gff) are available from this data collection for both genome sequences. Additionally, the genomic sequences from the mitochondria of both isolates D. coronariae from Dresden (DC1_JKI) and Japan (NBRC 30405) are provided (tig00000019_Mito_DC1_JKI.fa, GeSeqJob-20240105-133611_tig00000019_Mito_DC1_JKI.gff3, tig00000344_Mito_NBTC30405.fa, GeSeqJob-20240105-134830_tig00000344_Mito_NBRC30405.gff3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.500
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicElectronic Health Records SystemsFrench-language works237,207