Orcevia sica Yu & Maddison & Zhang 2023, comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orcevia sica (Wu & Yang, 2008) comb. nov. (Ṃĸ尔¤) Figs 21, 233–249 Laufeia sicus Wu & Yang, 2008: 19, figs A–C. Laufeia longapophysis Lei & Peng, 2012: 9, figs 4, 8a–c syn. nov. Type material. Holotype: ♂ (MHBU, examined), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Lushui County, Pianma Town, 2070– 2150 m elev., 11 May 2004, leg. Z. Yang. Other material examined. 1♂ (MHBU-ARA-00023556), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Baoshan City, Longyang District, Baihualing tourist area, 25.3044°N, 98.7991°E, 1653 m elev., leg. C. Jin, B. Zhou & X. Zang, YNBS-17- 17; 1♂ 1♀ (MHBU-ARA-00023555; MHBU-ARA-00023553), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Tengchong City, Mt. Laifeng, 14–15 May 2004, leg. Z. Yang; 1♂ (MHBU-ARA-00023554; DNA Voucher: KYU034), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Tengchong City, Xinhua Village, 24.8039°N, 98.5091°E, 1863 m elev., leg. C. Jin, B. Zhou & X. Zang, YNTC-17-05; 2♀ (MHBU-ARA-00023552), CHINA: Yunnan Province, Lianghe County, Mengyang Town, Kazi Village, 24.6092°N, 98.2471°E, 13 June 2021, leg. S. Zhang. Diagnosis. Males can be distinguished from the closely related O. wuliang sp. nov. by the relatively straight and slender RTA (Fig. 242), females can be distinguished from O. wuliang sp. nov. by the atria that are close to each other (Fig. 244), and the accessory glands that are invisible in dorsal view (Fig. 245). Description. Male. See Wu & Yang (2008). Female. Habitus as shown in Fig. 238. Measurements of paratype (KYU-SAL539): carapace length 2.38; abdomen length 2.83; measurements of eyes: AME 0.43, ALE 0.28, PME 0.05, PLE 0.22; measurements of legs: I 3.87 (1.22, 0.83, 0.75, 0.57, 0.50), II 3.48 (1.06, 0.75, 0.64, 0.57, 0.46), III 3.78 (1.26, 0.69, 0.68, 0.72, 0.43), IV 4.34 (1.30, 0.64, 1.00, 0.92, 0.48); leg formula 4132. Carapace dark, with sparse yellow setal band on axis, legs I–II slightly darker than III–IV. Epigynum and vulva (Figs 244–245): atria small, relatively close to each other; spermathecae large and close to each other; copulatory ducts with starting part covering the gap between spermathecae in ventral view; tubular accessory glands invisible in ventral view. Natural history. Specimens were collected from ground, or cracks on large rock. Distribution. China (Yunnan). Remark. The tubular accessory glands, the folded inner tubes in spermathecae, the shape of embolic disc and the shape of lobe-like protrusion of tegulum all indicate that this species belongs to Orcevia. Therefore, we herein propose this new combination. Topotypes of Laufeia longapophysis Lei & Peng, 2012 syn. nov. show the same body form and genital features as Orcevia sica (Wu & Yang, 2008) comb. nov., and therefore is synonymized with the latter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".