MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929816825 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11193046

Iranattus principalis

2024· article· en· W6929816825 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonomy (biology)CarapaceReceptacleParakeetSubgenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iranattus principalis (Wesołowska, 2000) Figs 2 – 7, 8 – 13, 14–19 Monomotapa principalis Wesołowska, 2000: 160, 42 – 46. Monomotapa principalis Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011: 581, 96 – 98, 229 – 230. Iranattus principalis Prószyński, 2017: 36, 14 K, 17 F (transferred from Monomotapa). Iranattus principalis Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2022: 47, 29 A – D, 30 A – D. Materials examined. In NHMUK, lacking complete labels. These are likely from Parc Nacional Banco, Côte d’Ivoire (see “ Materials examined ” for explanation). 2 ♀♀ (PNB 21) • 1 ♂ 1 ♀ (PNB 146) • 3 ♀♀ (PNB 156) • 2 ♀♀ (PNB 159) • 2 ♂♂ (PNB 167) • 2 ♀♀ (PNB 181) • 1 ♂ 1 ♀ (PNB 192) • 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ (PNB 203). Diagnosis. Larger than I. rectangularis, with an almost ovoid tegulum with a less prominent shoulder, RTA slightly bent near the tip (Figs 10, 11), and a multi-chambered spermatheca sandwiched between copulatory ducts dorsally and the epigynal plate ventrally. Description. ♂ (DDKM 21.089). Measurements: Carapace 2.2 long, 2.1 wide. Abdomen length 1.7; width 1.4. Leg measurements: I – 11.2 (3.4, 2.2, 2.4, 1.8, 1.3); II – 10 (2.8, 2, 2.4, 1.5, 1.2); III – 16.6 (6.3, 2.9, 3.2, 2.5, 1.7); IV – 10.1 (3.7, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.3). Leg formula III-IV-II-I. Carapace wider than abdomen. Ocular area shaped like an isosceles trapezoid, narrow at the anterior eye row and wide at the PLEs. PLEs on tubercles. Thoracic area slopes acutely downward behind ocular area. Ocular area anteriorly golden yellow, and remaining carapace dark brown. Lateral sides posteriorly and back sparsely covered with pale hairs. Clypeus narrow, yellowish-brown sparsely covered with hairs. Chelicerae vertical, narrow, yellowish brown. Palp (Figs 2 – 5, 8 – 11): Embolus medium-long, starting at 7 o’clock. RTA stout, short with blunt tip. Cymbium extends retrolaterally to form scoop-shaped apophysis. Tegulum prolaterally rounder; retrolaterally slightly angular at distal and proximal edges. Legs: III femur distinctly long. Femur golden yellow, distal segments yellowish-brown. Abdomen narrow, ovoid. Golden yellow with less prominent transverse pale bands. Spinnerets yellowish. ♀ (DDKM 21.090). Measurements: Carapace 5.1 long, 5.1 wide. Abdomen length 6.4; width 4.8. Leg measurements: I – 11.7 (3.8, 1.8, 2.7, 2.1, 1.3); II – 11.6 (3.3, 2.8, 2.4, 1.8, 1.3); III – 19.7 (6.9, 3.3, 4.7, 3.1, 1.8); IV – 11.4 (2.9, 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 1.5). Leg formula III-I-II-IV. Carapace shape similar to male, width about same as abdomen. Brown, sparsely covered with pale hairs. Clypeus similar to male. Chelicerae similar to male. Legs similar to male. Abdomen ovoid, bulky, yellowish, covered with brown hairs, and more posteriorly. Spinnerets yellowish. Epigyne (Figs 6, 7, 12, 13): Medially located copulatory opening flanked by conical-shaped ECP. Natural history. Wesołowska and Russell-Smith (2022) report Iranattus principalis as collected from the branches of savannah shrubs. G. Azarkina (pers. comm.) has seen material of this species from canopy fogging in tropical savannas in Cameroon (2 ♀ 8.40 ° N, 12.80 ° E) and Côte d’Ivoire (1 ♀ 8.40 ° N, 12.80 ° E; 2 ♂ 2 ♀ 8 ° 44 ' N, 3 ° 49 ' W) in the Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale, collected from the trees Cola laurifolia, Combretum fragrans, Anogeissus leiocarpus, and Crossopteryx febrifuga. Distribution. Côte d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, and Cameroon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207