Diagnosis and Treatments with Perceived Mentally Disturbed Persons: The Case of Traditional Healers in South Cotabato
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><span>This action research determines the performance level of Grade 3 pupils in Mathematics using modular distance learning.. The researcher utilized the descriptive method of research. There were 200 grade three pupils who acted as research participants.  Data were collected using the self-made questionnaire checklist distributed among the Grade 3 pupil participants. Google Forms was used to monitor the learners' responses. Relevant data were analyzed, evaluated, and interpreted utilizing the average mean and the percentage score. Based on the result, the frequency distribution of the 1st quarter grades obtained by the Grade 3 Pupils from Section Amber to Section Pearl showed that only 2% got outstanding marks; 20% got very good grades, 46% were good, and 32% were fair. This implied that during modular distance learning was not such effective in the 1st quarter due to adjustments done by the learners. During the 2nd quarter, 47 out of 200 pupils obtained very good grades. However, there are 30 learners who obtained 80-88 grades, while only 8 of them got the grade of 75-79. There was a big difference in the grades obtained from the 1st quarter to the 2nd quarter due to the adjustments made by the learners. The result of the study would be utilized as a basis for crafting a school action plan that would enhance the function of the Kamustahan Program in pupils’ performance.</span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it