Bibliographic record
Abstract
75. Boreophilia subplana (Sahlberg) * (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2021), Table 1 References. Sahlberg 1880. Lohse et al. 1990. Gusarov 2003. Smetana 2004. Klimaszewski et al. 2016b, 2019, 2021. Distribution. Holarctic, recorded from A/S (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Canada: NT, NU. USA: AK, NH. Collection and Habitat data. In NH captured in September from dwarf birch litter, and dwarf Salix, Vaccinium, leatherleaf litter. In Canada and Alaska found in Salix leaf litter, on tundra hillside, in black spruce forest, at brackish shoreline, and under rocks and wrack. Collected from June to August using hanging Malaise traps, aspirating from under rocks/cobbles, sweeping low vegetation, use of pitfall traps and pollinator cup/pitfalls, and by processing leaf litters with Berlese funnels (Klimaszewki et al. 2021). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Coos Co.: Mt. Washington, Alpine Garden, 5300’, 12.IX.1987, J.M. Campbell and A. Davies, sifting dwarf birch litter (CNC), 1 female. Mt. Washington above tree line, 5200–5700’, 10.IX.1987, J.M. Campbell and A. Davies, dwarf Salix, Vaccinium, leatherleaf litter (CNC) 1 male, 1 female. Mt. Washington is the type locality of the two junior synonyms Atheta (Metaxya) angusticornis Bernhauer (1907) and Metaxya plutonica Casey (1910). Comments. Bernhauer (1907) described Atheta (Metaxya) angusticornis from Mount Washington, NH, USA. Gusarov (2003) transferred it to the genus Boreophilia, and considered it closely related to B. subplana, from which he differentiated it by the “shape of aedeagus, particularly a narrower apex of the median lobe in “parameral view” (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). We have studied the median lobe of AK and NH specimens and found no differences warranting different species recognition. The Mount Washington, NH, population represents an isolated, southernmost population of this species known only from higher latitudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".