Bibliographic record
Abstract
131. Trichiusa pilosa Casey (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Casey 1893, 1906. Klimaszewski et al. 2015, 2018. Webster et al. 2016. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: AB, BC, NB, NS, ON. USA: ID, IN, KS, ME (NSR), NH (NSR), OH, RI. Collection and Habitat data. In NH adults were captured in maple litter along a stream in a forest, leaf litter around pool edge, beach wrack, and by FIT and window traps. Collected from May to August with most collections taken in May. In Canada specimens were taken among cobblestones on a lakeshore and from a Lindgren funnel trap in the canopy of Populus tremuloides in a hardwood forest; one individual was found in bison dung in BC, and another taken by a window trap set in a 10-year-old regenerating white spruce stand in AB (Webster et al. 2016, Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, Maine, York Co.: West Lebanon, 15–28.V.1990, D.W. Barry, FIT, 1 female. New Hampshire, Carroll Co.: 2 mi NW Wonalancet, 6–14.VI.1984, D.S. Chandler, window trap, 1 female. Grafton Co.: Bedell Bridge S. P. @ Oliverian Brook, 7–24.V.1992, D.S. Chandler, FITrap, 1 sex?; 3.VII.1992, D.S. Chandler, berlese maple litter along stream in forest, 1 male. Rockingham Co.: 2 mi SE Epping, Rockingham Co. Farm, 1.VIII.1986, 1 female; 2.VIII.1986,1 male, S.C. Sherman, pig dung in pasture. Odiorne Point St. Park, 15.VI.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter around pool edge, 1 male, 3 females. Newcastle Common, 12.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift beach wrack, 1 male.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".