Synaptomys (Synaptomys) cooperi Baird 1857
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synaptomys (Synaptomys) cooperi Baird 1857 Synaptomys (Synaptomys) cooperi Baird 1857, Mammalia, in: Repts. U. S. Expl. Surv., Vol. 8, 1: 558. Type Locality: USA, New Hampshire, Carroll Co., Jackson (as fixed by Bole and Moulthrop, 1942:146). Vernacular Names: Southern Bog Lemming. Synonyms: Synaptomys (Synaptomys) fatuus Bangs 1896; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) gossii (Coues 1877); Synaptomys (Synaptomys) helaletes Merriam 1896; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) jesseni Long 1987; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) kentucki Barbour 1956; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) paludis Hibbard and Rinker 1942; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) relictus Jones 1958; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) saturatus Bole and Moulthrop 1942; Synaptomys (Synaptomys) stonei Rhoads 1893. Distribution: Midwestern and E USA through SE Canada, including Nova Scotia and Cape Breton Isl; as far south as W North Carolina and NE Arkansas; outlying populations in SW Kansas, W Nebraska, and the Dismal Swamp region of SE Virginia-NE North Carolina. Conservation: IUCN – Extinct as S. c. paludis and S. c. relictus, otherwise Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Subgenus Synaptomys. Geographic diversification within the species evaluated by Wetzel (1955), who refined the subspecific arrangement. Geographic variation among populations in the C Great Plains studied by Wilson and Choate (1997), who retained subspecies defined within the region and commented upon the conservation status of the relictual races (paludis and relictus) isolated at the western margin of the species distribution; for new range reports and biogeographic discussion of populations (helaletes) at the eastern periphery of the species distribution, see Lee and Clark (1993) and Clark et al. (1993). Using landmark data, Courant et al. (1997) demonstrated stronger convergence in cranial shape between S. cooperi and surface dwelling voles like Myodes rather than its lemming relatives. See Linzey (1983, Mammalian Species, 210).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".