MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6929916548 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406238

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) lineatus Lindsay & Marshall 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6929916548 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeParatypeChaetotaxyThorax (insect anatomy)SternumBlack spot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) lineatus sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 510264E5-B90E-4C03-9D25-A68DAF23F855 Fig. 58 Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) lineatus sp. nov. resembles S. (Ph.) melaneuris in having a dull, orange, microtrichose epicephalon but can be easily distinguished by the almost entirely yellow femora. Etymology The species name, from the Latin word for ‘streak’ refers to the hyaline stripe on the wing. Type material examined Holotype SAINT LUCIA • 1 ♂; Descartiers Trail; 400 m a.s.l.; 25 Dec 2002; S.A. Marshall leg.; UGIC256-15/ MYCRO157-15 sequenced for CO1; DEBU (dissected and photographed, Fig. 58B, D). Paratype SAINT LUCIA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; UGIC232-15/MYCRO133-15 unsuccessfully sequenced for CO1; DEBU (dissected and photographed, Fig. 58A, C, E–F). Description LENGTH. 10 mm. HEAD. Palpus orange, pale microtrichose, setulose and narrow (length 4.2 × height). Clypeus light brown, width ~2.1 × height, silvery microtrichose on entire surface. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose. Epicephalon dull, orange, microtrichose, not clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. One lower fronto-orbital seta absent; all other head chaetotaxy well developed. THORAX. Scutum black-brown, brown microtrichose, with a wide, silvery blue median sheen. Female cervical sclerite relatively flat. Postpronotal lobe black-brown with silvery microtrichosity lining posterior margin, setulose on outer lateral margin. Notopleuron black-brown with silvery-blue spot surrounding anterior notopleural seta. Thorax black-brown with blue sheen, entirely silvery microtrichose, more sparsely ventrally and medially on anepisternum and katepisternum, appearing bare at some angles. Femora almost entirely yellow, apex black; first fore and hind tarsomere black with ventral golden fringe. Wing mostly hyaline, infuscate apically and discally, forming subapical hyaline stripe. ABDOMEN (J+ ♀). T1 with fine, long, white setae. FEMALE ABDOMEN. Pleuron pale grey, dark brown on dorsal half of P2–5. T1+2 ~2.0 × length of T3. Posterior margin of T2 ~1.8× as wide as that of T1. Oviscape black, microtrichosity not observed (not visible on dissection), ~3.5 × length of T6. Common duct rugose, clearly delineated from paired duct, long and narrow (~⅓ of entire duct length). Paired spermathecal duct short (2.0 × length of paired spermathecae, although spermathecae are large in this species), parallel-sided, swollen apically. Paired spermathecal stems very short. Paired spermathecae large, elongate, slightly expanded distally and conspicuously and densely tuberculate. Single spermathecal duct arising from base of paired duct, narrow, <½ diameter and length as paired duct, swollen distally. Single spermatheca similar in structure to paired spermathecae but much smaller and apically bifid. MALE ABDOMEN. Pleuron of available male discoloured. T1+2 ~2.0× length of T3. Genital fork 1.5× as long as T6, with arms converging; inner basal process pointed inwards, very short. Epandrium elongate (length ~2.0× height). Basiphallus small, frame-like. Basal distiphallus long (≈ length of epandrium), broad. Phallic bulb small, short (length ≈ height), with poorly defined upper and lower chamber. Distal distiphallus long and whip-like, 1.5× epandrial length. Phallapodeme and anterior hypandrium slender, not expanded. Distribution Saint Lucia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207