FIGURE 2 in New occurrences of Belonostomus (Teleostomorpha: Aspidorhynchidae) from the Late Cretaceous of the North American Gulf Coastal Plain, USA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIGURE 2. An expanded map showing all known localities in North America that have produced Belonostomus fossils. 1. Ashville Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada. 2. Frenchman Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada. 3. Kaskapau Formation, Alberta, Canada. 4. Foremost and Oldman formations, Alberta, Canada. 5. Dinosaur Park Formation, Alberta, Canada. 6. Horseshoe Canyon, Alberta, Canada 7. St. Mary River Formation, Alberta, Canada. 8. Tongue River Formation, North Dakota, USA.9. Judith River Formation, Montana, USA. 10. Hell Creek Formation, Montana, USA 11. Judith River Formation, North Dakota, USA 12. Hell Creek Formation, North Dakota, USA. 13. Lance Formation, Wyoming, USA. 14. Mesa Verde Formation, Wyoming, USA, 15. Prairie Bluff Chalk, Mississippi, USA. 16. Tombigbee Sand Member of the Eutaw Formation, Alabama, USA 17. Paluxy Formation, Texas, USA 18. Austin Chalk Formation, Texas, USA 19. Del Rio Formation, Texas, USA, 20. Eagle Ford Formation, Texas, USA. 21. Agua Nueva Formation, Nuevo Leon, México. 22. Tlayua Formation, Puebla, México. 23. Cerro de la Virgen Formation, Oaxaca, México.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".