1970 British Cohort Study: Sweeps 3-9, 1980-2012, Townsend Index (LSOA) Linked Data: Secure Access
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The&nbsp;<em>1970 British Cohort Study</em>&nbsp;(BCS70) began in 1970 when data were collected about the births and families of babies born in the United Kingdom in one particular week in 1970. Since then, there have been nine further full data collection exercises in order to monitor the cohort members' health, education, social and economic circumstances. These took place when respondents were aged 5 in 1975, aged 10 in 1980, aged 16 in 1986, aged 26 in 1996, aged 30 in 1999-2000 (SN 5558), aged 34 in 2004-2005, aged 42 in 2012 and aged 46 in 2016-18. Cohort members have been surveyed throughout their childhood and adult lives, mapping their individual trajectories and creating a unique resource for researchers.&nbsp;</p><p>Featuring a range of objective measures and rich self-reported data, BCS70 covers an incredible amount of ground and can be used in research on many topics. It is one of very few longitudinal studies following people of this generation anywhere in the world.</p><p>Evidence from BCS70 has illuminated important issues for society across five decades. Key findings include how reading for pleasure&nbsp;matters for children’s cognitive development, why grammar schools have not reduced social inequalities, and how childhood experiences can impact on mental health in mid-life. Every day researchers from across the scientific community are using this important study to make new connections and discoveries.</p><p>Further information about the BCS70 and may be found on the&nbsp;<a title="Centre for Longitudinal Studies" href="http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/">Centre for Longitudinal Studies</a>&nbsp;website. As well as BCS70, the CLS now also conducts the NCDS series.</p><p>A range of BCS sub-sample and supplementary surveys have also been conducted, and a separate dataset covering response to BCS70 over all waves is available under SN 5641,&nbsp;<em>1970 British Cohort Study Response Dataset, 1970-2012.</em></p><p> </p><p><em>How to access genetic and/or bio-medical sample data from a range of longitudinal surveys:</em><br>A useful overview of the governance routes for applying for genetic and bio-medical sample data, which are not available through the UK Data Service, can be found at&nbsp;<a title="Governance of data and sample access" href="http://www.metadac.ac.uk/data-access-through-metadac/">Governance of data and sample access</a>&nbsp;on the METADAC (Managing Ethico-social, Technical and Administrative issues in Data Access) website.</p> <div>The <span style="font-style: italic;">1970 British Cohort Study: Sweeps 3-9, 1980-2012, Townsend Index (LSOA) Linked Data: Secure Access </span>study includes the Towsend Index of Deprivation data for Sweeps 3-9 of the BCS70, as well as the variables needed to construct these.<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">International Data Access Network (IDAN)</span><br>These data are now available to researchers based outside the UK. Selected UKDS SecureLab/controlled datasets from the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) and the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) have been made available under the International Data Access Network (IDAN) scheme, via a Safe Room access point at one of the UKDS IDAN partners. Prospective users should read the&nbsp;<a href="https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/app/uploads/securelab-access-to-non-ons-data_idan.pdf" target="_blank" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">UKDS SecureLab application guide for non-ONS data for researchers outside of the UK via Safe Room Remote Desktop Access</a>. Further details about the IDAN scheme can be found on the&nbsp;<a href="https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/about/research-and-development/international-data-access-network-idan/" target="_blank" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">UKDS International Data Access Network</a>&nbsp;webpage and on the&nbsp;<a href="https://idan.network/" target="_blank" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">IDAN</a>&nbsp;website.<br></div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".