Bibliographic record
Abstract
48. Atheta (Lamiota) keeni Casey (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2020, 2021), Table 1 References. Casey 1910. Gusarov 2003. Klimaszewski and Winchester 2002a (as L. vasta). Klimaszewski et al. 2020, 2021. Distribution. Nearctic, transcontinental in Canada, reported from A/S (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Canada:AB, BC. USA: AK, NH (NSR), OR. Collection and Habitat data. In NH a single female was captured in a FIT in June at a site near the border with Quebec. In AK found in forest litter of Alnus, Verathrum, and ferns (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). In BC found in a transition zone of Sitka spruce, in dung and carrion, in Alnus litter, in moss, fern, and Amelanchier litter at edge of upland pond, and in moss and leaf litter near a creek; in AB found in a Douglas fir and lodgepole pine stand with aspen and birch understory (Klimaszewski et al. 2021). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Coos Co.: 1 mi NE East Inlet Dam, 12–24.VI.1996, D.S. Chandler, FIT, 1 female. Comments. The record from NH should be consider as a tentative one because it is based only on single female specimen, and there is a possibility of confusion with some other species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.037 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".