Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi Baird 1857
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi Baird 1857 Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi Baird 1857, Mammalia, in: Repts. U. S. Expl. Surv., Vol. 8, 1: 32. Type Locality: USA, Wisconsin, Racine. Vernacular Names: American Pygmy Shrew. Subspecies:: Subspecies Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi subsp. hoyi Baird 1857 Subspecies Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi subsp. alnorum Preble 1902 Subspecies Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi subsp. eximius Osgood 1901 Subspecies Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi subsp. montanus Brown 1966 Subspecies Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi subsp. thompsoni Baird 1858 Subspecies Sorex (Otisorex) hoyi subsp. winnemana Preble 1910 Distribution: N taiga zone of Alaska, Canada and the USA, with S outliers in the montane forests of the Appalachian and Rocky Mtns. Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc). Discussion: Formerly in Microsorex, which is a synonym of subgenus Otisorex, according to George (1988). Includes thompsoni since Diersing (1980 b), but D. T. Stewart (in litt.) suggested that it may be a distinct species, as previously postulated by Long (1972 b). Reviewed by Long (1974, Mammalian Species No. 33) and Junge and Hoffmann (1981). Sorex browni George, 1988 [replacement name for minutus (Brown, 1908), not Linnaeus, 1766] is the name for a Wisconsinan shrew related, if not conspecific, with S. hoyi. The name montanus used by Long (in Wilson and Ruff, 1999) for the Colorado and Wyoming population is a secondary homonym of S. montanus Kelaart (now Suncus montanus), and may therefore persist (Hutterer and Zaitsev, 2004). Karyotype insufficently known; Meylan (1968) provisionally identified 2n = 62, FN = 72.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".