Bibliographic record
Abstract
v0.9.1 (2024-06-04) Contributors to this version: Pascal Bourgault (@aulemahal), Trevor James Smith (@Zeitsperre), Juliette Lavoie (@juliettelavoie). Breaking changes xscen now uses a src layout in lieu of a flat layout. (PR/407). Bug fixes Fixed defaults for xr_combine_kwargs in extract_dataset (PR/402). Fixed bug with xs.utils.update_attr(GH/404, PR/405). Fixed template 1 bugs due to changes in dependencies. ( PR/405). Internal changes cartopy has been pinned above version '0.23.0' in order to address a licensing issue. (PR/403). The cookiecutter template has been updated to the latest commit via cruft. (PR/407). GitHub Workflows now point to commits rather than tags. Dependabot will now only update on a monthly schedule. Dependencies have been updated and synchronized. CHANGES.rst is now CHANGELOG.rst (see: KeepAChangelog). The CODE_OF_CONDUCT.rst file adapted to Contributor Covenant v2.1 _. Maintainer-specific directions are now found under releasing.rst
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.408 | 0.632 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".