MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6930495415 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15342287

Cytospora piceicola Ilyukhin & Markovsk. 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6930495415 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConidiumMyceliumHyphaFungusPhylogenetic treeTaxonomy (biology)ChlamydosporeAscomycotaPycnidium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cytospora piceicola Ilyukhin & Markovsk. sp. nov. Fig. 4 Etymology. The name refers to the host genus, Picea, from which the fungus was first isolated. Holotype. Canada • Ontario, Lincoln, 43°06'39.0"N, 79°19'15.4"W, isolated from cankered wood (branches) of Picea glauca, April 2020, E. Ilyukhin (holotype BILAS 51884, ex-holotype living culture BILAS 51886 = EI-20, isotype DAOM 985024, DAOMC 256985). Description. Sexual morph: not observed in culture. Asexual morph: Conidiomata appearing after 25 days of incubation on MEA, rare, pycnidial, solitary, globose to subglobose, dark grey to black when dry, with few ovoid locules, (610 –) 824–1071 (– 1380) μm diam. Conidiophores micronematous, hyaline, smooth-walled, reduced to unbranched conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, phialidic, lageniform, or ampulliform (7.5 –) 8.8–10.6 (– 13.0) × (1.0 –) 1.3–1.7 (– 2.0) μm. Conidia abundant, relatively small, single, hyaline, aseptate, slightly curved, allantoid, thin-walled (3.5 –) 3.8–4.9 (– 5.5) × (1.0 –) 0.8–1.3 (– 1.5) μm. Culture characteristics. Colonies on MEA white to light brown with short aerial mycelium tufts in the center, becoming darker with age, relatively slow-growing (28 mm in diameter) after 7 days of incubation. Hyphae hyaline, smooth, branched, and septate. Notes. Based on ITS sequence data, C. piceicola is 99 % similar to C. globosa MFLU: 16-2054 (554 / 559, 3 gaps) and C. pinastri CBS 113.81 (540 / 545, 0 gaps). But combined multi-gene phylogenetic analysis clearly distinguished C. piceicola from these two species (ML / BI = 95 / -). The new species, C. piceicola, differs from C. globosa (4–6.5 × 1–2 µm) and C. pinastri (4–7 × 1–1.3 μm) by having shorter conidia and clearly lageniform or ampulliform conidiogenous cells (Hayova and Minter 2013; Li et al. 2020). The culture characteristics cannot be used for species discrimination as they are either unavailable (C. pinastri) or different media has been used (C. globosa). Thus, C. piceicola is considered a novel species based on both molecular data and morphological characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSoil and Unsaturated Flow→French-language works237,207→