Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vanhornia quizhouensis (He & Chu, 1990) (Figs. 6A–F) Sincivanhornia quizhouensis He & Chu, 1990: 102-103. Holotype (not examined): female; type locality: Guizhou, Central China. Vanhornia quizhouensis: Kozlov, 1998: 677 (transferred to Vanhornia). Diagnosis. Punctures between median ocellus and frontal transverse carina small, same size with ones on anterior half of head; frontal transverse carina present; apical margin of labrum convex. Scutoscutellar sulcus with five foveae; mesodiscrimen with about six strong foveae; transverse carina on dorsal part of propodeum complete; postero-lateral part of propodeum with smooth area. Vein Rs+M not connected to Cu. Syntergite with longitudinal ridges, reaching to a maximum of 0.4 length of syntergite, not touching first thyridium; antero-dorsal margin of syntergite almost straight. Non-types. Laos: 1f, Xieng Khouang, Ban ban to Ban Tha, 11 km N from Muangkham, 19°41’N, 103°36’E, 2 V 2011, T. Mita (ELKU); 1f, Xieng Khouang District Nong Samche, 19°32’15.90”N, 103°54’53.00”E, 1577 m, 1 V 2015, T. Mita (ELKU). Host. Unknown. Distribution. Central China (Timokhov & Belokobylskij 2020), Laos (new record), Thailand? (Artmann-Graf 2016). Remarks. The record from Thailand reported in Artmann-Graf (2016) is based on a personal communication with Dr Lubomír Masner (Canadian National Collection of Insects) and without any specimen data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".