Plagiothecium sylvaticum var. sylvaticum Schimp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plagiothecium sylvaticum var. sylvaticum (Brid.) Schimp., Bryologia Europea 5: 192, 503. 1851. ≡ Hypnum sylvaticum Brid., Muscologiae Recentiorum 2 (2): 53, 1 f. 5. 1801 ≡ Hypnum denticulatum var. sylvaticum (Brid.) Turner, Muscologiae Hibernicae Spicilegium 146. 1804 ≡ Stereodon sylvaticus (Brid.) Brid., Bryologia Universa 2: 825, 1827 ≡ Hypnum denticulatum subsp. sylvaticum (Brid.) Boulay, Muscinées de la France, Mousses 85. 1884 ≡ Plagiothecium denticulatum subsp. sylvaticum (Brid.) Dixon, Student’s Handbook of British Mosses 437. 1896. Lectotype (the clump at the top of the sheet, selected by Iwatsuki 1970): [Germany,] saltus Thuringicus in paluda, ex herb. Brid., B 31091501! = Plagiothecium sylvaticum var. flavescens Warnst., Allegmeine Botanische Zeitschrift für Systematik, Floristik, Pflanzengeographie 5 (1): 34. 1899. Lectotype (designated here): [Germany,] am Gaisriegl Dreitannenriegel, Bayr Wald, in Quellsümpfen, 1887, M. Lickleder, PC 0132583! syn. nov. = Plagiothecium platyphyllum Mönk., Die Laubmoose Europas 866, 207 b. 1927 ≡ Plagiothecium sylvaticum var. platyphyllum (Mönk.) F. Koppe, Abhandlungen und Berichte der Naturwissenschaftlichen Abteilung der Grenzmärkischen Gesellschaft zur Erforschung und Pflege der Heimat, Schneidemühl 1931 ≡ P. neglectum subsp. platyphyllum (Mönk.) Szafran, Flora Polska Mchy (Musci) 2: 288, 1961, comb. inval. Type: Germany, bei Gersfeld in der Rohn 1906, ferner mir aus Thüringen unddem sächsischen Vogtlande unter anderer Bezeichnung bekannt geworden; The Czech Republic, ferner 1911 im Böhmerwalde bei Eisenstein gesammelt. Lectotype (designated by Wolski et al. 2024): Germany, Thüringien, Finsteres Loch, 26 June 1916, R. Schmidt, HBG! = Plagiothecium ruthei fo. submersum Bizot, in sched. Basis: France, Vosges, Hohneck, immergé dans le lac du Frankenthal, M. Bizot 2910, PC 0132598! = Plagiothecium ruthei var. rivulare Mayl. in sched. Basis: Switzerland, Uri, entre Göschenen et Andermatt, Sep., 1903, Thériot, J. J. Amann, PC 0132602! syn. nov. Description. Plants medium-sized to large, light green, dull, without metallic luster; leaves complanate, more or less flat, ovate, not imbricate and not julaceous, symmetrical, 2.0–3.0 × 1.0– 1.6 mm (Fig. 3 A); the apex acute and denticulate, often eroded; laminal cells 75–160 × 12.5–20 μm at midleaf (Fig. 3 D), cell areolation loose; decurrencies long, consisting of 3–4 rows of rounded and inflated cells; capsule inclined. Distribution. Asia (China, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Georgia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Turkey); Europe (Andorra, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom); North America (Canada, U. S. A.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".