Bibliographic record
Abstract
191 Euura oligospila group The species group was revised by Prous et al. (2021): see there for details of type material, synonymy, host plants, distribution, and identification characters. Females of the group are extremely similar to those of E. bergmanni, E. respondens, and E. sylvestris of the E. bergmanni group. These E. bergmanni group species tend to have a basal extension at the base of tangium (forming a concavity at the base of tangium), which seems to be absent in the oligospila group (this was overlooked by Prous et al. 2021). There may be some small additional differences between the lancets of the E. oligospila group and E. bergmanni and E. respondens (see Prous et al. 2021). Euura sylvestris seems to have a longer malar space (more than 1.4 times as long as diameter of front ocellus), usually less deeply emarginate clypeus, and more rectangular head in dorsal view than oligospila group (malar space usually less than 1.4 times as long as diameter of front ocellus). Penis valves enable more reliable separation of the oligospila group from the bergmanni group and the other Euura. The valviceps in the oligospila group is basally about as broad as apically, has a weak or distinct constriction in the middle, and the invagination between valvispina and paravalva is indistinct (Prous et al. 2021). Two species are recognised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".