Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dichoglena nigrina (Kröber) Specimens examined (4). BC: Ashcroft, Cornwall Hills; Atlin, Pine Creek beach; Hedley. YT: Ethel Lake Road, km 12. DEBU, RBCM, ROME, Database and literature records (11). BC: Princeton, 6.4 km W; Robson; Vernon. YT: LaForce Lake. CNCI, INHS, MEI, SEM. Conservation status. BC: S4, YT: SU Distributional notes. This fly is uncommon in the southern Interior valleys of British Columbia from the Princeton and Ashcroft areas east through the Okanagan to the Columbia Valley at Robson; it is recorded in the far north at Atlin. Based on records in adjacent jurisdictions, the species is likely widespread over much of the province’s Interior. There are two occurrences in the south-central Yukon (LaForce and Ethel lakes); almost certainly the species ranges throughout the southern Yukon and probably across much of boreal Canada. Ecoprovinces and other designations. BC: Southern Interior, Southern Interior Mountains, Northern Boreal Mountains. YT: Boreal Cordillera. Range. Cordilleran (plus eastern distribution). Yukon and British Columbia east to Ontario and Quebec; Maine south to New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oklahoma, New Mexico, California (Webb et al. 2013). Biological notes. Flight period: 6 March–21 July. In the region, Dichoglena nigrina has been collected in sandy areas such as beaches and roadsides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".