Bibliographic record
Abstract
Other Edwardsiella species include: Edwardsiella carnea (Gosse, 1856) isknown from many records from European seas. It typically has fewer tentacles than E. loveni, and its retractor muscles on cross sections are much weaker and have fewer muscle processes (Carlgren, 1921). The colour, with its “deep orange” (Manuel, 1988: 196) or “scarlet-red” (Carlgren, 1921: 62) actinopharynx and inner part of the oral disc also may be characteristic. Edwardsiella ignota (Carlgren, 1959) is known only from original description from Peru (Carlgren, 1959). Fautin (2016) lists it among valid species but states it is “ nomen dubium according to Williams, 1981 ”, however there is no such statement in the paper of Williams (1981). Original description of E. ignota is detailed enough and accompanied by figures; it cannot be regarded as nomen dubium. According to Carlgren (1959) it has 20 or possibly 24 tentacles, i.e. the species has significantly fewer tentacles than all other Edwardsiella species. Edwardsiella lineata (Verrill, 1873), known only from Atlantic coast of North America, was redescribed by Daly (2002). It typically forms dense compact clusters of many specimens. Tentacles of this species have characteristic white lines running along their oral sides. Daly (2002) found unusual long basitrichs in the filaments of E. lineata. We failed to find anything similar in the examined specimens of E. loveni. Note: Pairwise distances between species are under the diagonal, estimates of standard errors are above the diagonal. Замечание: Попарные расстоЯниЯ между видами расположены под основной диагональю, ЗначениЯ стандартных оШибок — над диагональю. The status of fifth nominal species included in the genus, E. janthina (Andres, 1881), described from Mediterranean Sea, is not clear. Williams (1981) transferred Edwardsia janthina Andres, 1881 to Fagesia (junior objective synonym of Edwardsiella). This opinion was based solely on the picture of Andres (1883) where anemone is shown protruding from the hole in rock. Williams (1981) thought it may be synonymous with Edwardsiella carnea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".