FIGURE 27 in Taxonomic revision and natural history of Metaphotina Piza, 1964 (Mantodea, Acontistidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIGURE 27. Specimens of Acontistidae observed on flowers. Observations from the iNaturalist platform. All licenses CCBY-NC. Images may have been cropped and/or rotated for better observation. (A) Metaphotina bimaculata, observation 163494494, by goncrisdi [Gonzalo Diaz], Argentina, 06/May/2023. (B) Metaphotina bimaculata, observation 150734041, by cirino, Brazil (PR), 08/Mar/2023. (C) Callibia diana, observation 144956392, by aemg [Association d'étude des Mantes de Guyane], French Guiana, 09/Mar/2019. (D) Raptrix perspicua, observation 144354598, by michel405 [Michel Giraud-Audine], French Guiana, 09/Dec/2022. (E) Acontista concinna, observation 82958656, by gabrielecordeiro [Gabriele Cordeiro], Brazil (MG), 24/Apr/2021. (F) Acontista multicolor, observation 150766735, by amydeacontt [Amy Deacon], Trinidad and Tobago, 10/Mar/2023.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".