Bibliographic record
Abstract
ERDOSIELLA Soyka, 1956 (Figs 124–129) Erdösiella [sic] Soyka, 1956b: 16. Type species: Erdosiella acarensis Soyka, 1956, by original designation. Tanaomymar Annecke & Doutt, 1961: 25. Type species: Tanaomymar mirum Annecke & Doutt, 1961, by original designation. Synonymy by Fidalgo, 1992: 75. Stenomymar Ogloblin, 1967: 184. Type species: Stenomymar decoratus Ogloblin, 1967, by original designation. Synonymy by Fidalgo, 1992: 7. In a footnote, Fidalgo attributed the synonymy to Yoshimoto (1990) but his paper was still in press at the time so Fidalgo must take the credit. Tanyostethium Yoshimoto, 1990: 74. Type species: Tanyostethium elongatum, 1990, by original designation. Syn. nov. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and without a pit medially next to each torulus (Fig. 124a); toruli separated by about their own height, or less than half their height (Fig. 124a) from transverse trabecula; antenna often with apical two funicle segments as wide as clava (Fig. 125); propleura widely abutting each other anterior to prosternum; fore wing with or without brown bands and some microtrichia arranged in distinct rows (Fig. 126); entire venation close to anterior margin of wing (costal cell extremely narrow except anterior to submarginal vein), parastigma with short, inconspicuous proximal macrochaeta, and distal macrochetae and marginal vein absent (Fig. 126); propodeum with a partial median carina or entirely without (Fig. 127); petiole attached posteriorly to gs 1, ovipositor and sheaths equally long and extending distinctly beyond apex of gaster (Fig. 128). Remarks. Erdosiella belongs to the Polynema group of genera. The species with the apical two funicle segments greatly widened are easy to recognize; the others, e.g., E. elongatum and some undescribed species large in size, with or without a banded fore wing. The genus is variable with uncertain limits. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Fidalgo (1992).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".