MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930722461 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13850886

Enhancing the Reliability of Urea Pumps in Fertilizer Production Lines through Exponential Reliability Analysis

2024· article· en· W6930722461 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitchoverBackupReliability (semiconductor)FertilizerRedundancy (engineering)ScheduleProduction (economics)Production lineCondenser (optics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aimed at improving the reliability of the urea pump of a fertilizer production line at Urea Plant of Notore Chemical Industry Limited, Onne, Rivers State, Nigeria, using reliability exponential analysis.The investigation of the constraints associated with the performance of the fertilizer production line by analysis of maintenance log revealed that the pump was the most frequently failed critical component. Failure data of the urea pump, evaporator, scrubber and condenser were obtained from logged maintenance activities, which were used to carry out reliability analysis using exponential failure distribution model for a period of five years (2014 to 2018). Thereafter, triple redundancy was introduced to have enhance a balanced pressure and act as backup when failure occurs and consequently prevent breakdown. Also, a pressure monitors with an alarm system had been installed for immediate switchover to avoid sudden breakdown and equally reduce change over time prior to corrective maintenance. Results of reliability analysis carried out showed that reliability decreased from 64% to 30% from 2014 to 2018. However, after improvement strategies with redundant pumps, reliability for each year improved thus, 2014, 22%, 2015 35%, 2016, 36%, 2017, 35%, 2018, 34% respectively. This gives an average of 32.4% increase across the years. Conclusively, Preemptive maintenance strategy was adopted by planning maintenance schedule to coincide with idling time or shut down period to minimize losses from breakdown or corrective maintenance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207