TABLE 3 in Bunites distigma (Brullé, 1837): discovery of the second- and third-instar larvae and phylogenetic relationships within the Colymbetinae (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TABLE 3. Data matrix used for the phylogenetic analysis. The taxon marked with ‘*’ was studied only as instar III. Missing data coded ‘?’. SpeciesCharacter0000000000111111111122222222223333333333444444444455555555556666666666701234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890Matus bicarinatus01001011000010010110100000010011110010100110010000011000011100010300001Platynectes curtulus00002100000001010000000001100002210000001011000000000100000000000100000Copelatus longicornis01001101000000010000000020000001111100001001000000000000000000101000000Lancetes marginatus00000100001000111000111000000002111100000001110001011100000100101000011Bunites distigma0011511111000110100200000020000111101000111011111111112111111100031?211Carabdytes upin *00?????1??0?01?0000?000?00000?000010?00??110???????111?01001?1????00??1Colymbetes dolabratus0010?111000001101000000000000001111010000110111000011100111111?0?001001Hoperius planatus00106111000001101112000000011001111011111110111011111121111111021200211Meladema lanio00115111110000101000000001100001111010011110001111111121111111000300211Melanodytes pustulatus00105111000??11?????000?00000?0??110100011101110000111001??1110002000?1Meridiorhantus antarcticus nahueli00004111000001101000000010000001111010000110110001011100011111000010000Meridiorhantus calidus00002011001001101000011000100011110000000110110000011100100111000001000Meridiorhantus orbignyi00002111000001101000000000000001111010000110110000011100000111000010000Meridiorhantus validus00005111000001100000000000100011111010000110111000011100111111000000211Nartus grapii00104111000021101000000101000111111011110110111011011110111111000000001Neoscutopterus hornii001061111000211010020000000010011110?011111011101111112111111002030020?Rhantus anisonychus00104111000101101000000100000101111011100110111011011110111111000011001Rhantus binotatus00103111000101101000000100000101111011100110111011011110101111000011001Rhantus calileguai00103111000001101000000000000101111011101110111011011110101111000011001Rhantus consputus00104111000001101000000000000001111011100110111011111110111111000011001Rhantus exsoletus00104111000001101000000000000001111011101110111011111110111111000011001Rhantus fennicus00104111000001101000000000000001111011100110111011111111111111000011001Rhantus notaticollis00103111000001101000000000000001111011100110111011111110111111000011001Rhantus phocaenarum00104111000001101000000000000001111011100110111011011110101111000010001Rhantus selkirki10104111000001101001000000000001111010001110000111111110111101000110111Rhantus signatus kuscheli00103111000001101000000000000001111011101110111011011110101111000011001Rhantus signatus signatus00103111000001101000000000000001111011101110111011011110101111000011001Rhantus socialis00104111000001101000000000000001111011100110111011011110101111000011001Rhantus suturellus00104111000001101000000000000001111001101110111111111111111111000011001Rhantus wallisi00104111000001101000000000000001111011100110111111111111111111000011001
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".