Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acrosathe Irwin & Lyneborg Acrosathe is a Holarctic and Oriental genus (Webb 2009). Males usually are covered in silver-white hairs, at least on the abdomen. Many species live on coastal sand dunes but others inhabit mountains and are often found on lake beaches and other sandy habitats near water. Webb (2009) gives keys to the males and females of the North American species. Acrosathe otiosa (Coquillett) is the only species of the genus previously recorded from British Columbia and Canada (Webb et al. 2013). All specimens of Acrosathe from British Columbia that we have examined key to A. vialis, based on wing colour and most male genitalic characters. This even includes some specimens identified as A. otiosa by D.W. Webb, the revisor of the genus and author of the species identification key (Webb 2009). In one case, specimens collected at the same place, on the same date, by the same collector were identified as both A. otiosa and A. vialis; males as the former, females as the latter. Acrosathe otiosa and A. vialis are very similar morphologically and distinguishing them is problematic as some of the diagnostic characters are somewhat variable. For the purposes of this study, we include A. vialis as a British Columbia species but also accept A. otiosa because of the identifications of unexamined specimens in databases and the literature. This study is not a revisionary systematic work; we expect future work on the genus will clarify this taxonomic confuseion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".