Bibliographic record
Abstract
montana Steyskal, 1954b: 534, figs. 1, 32–33, 39 (♂ terminalia, hypandrial process, ♀ sternites) HT: ♂ United States, California, Marin Co., Paradise Cove, 21.VII.[1946], E.L. Kessel. CAS, No. 11999 AT: ♀ United States, California, Marin Co., Paradise Cove, 20.VII.[1946], E.L. Kessel PT: ♂ ♀ numbers not given, 14, 19, 27.VII.1946, 24.IV.1947. 20.I–20.XI, from Canada: British Columbia (three localities), Saskatchewan (one locality). United States: California (13 localities), Idaho (two localities), Nevada (one locality), Oregon (one locality), Utah (one locality), Washington (two localities). In CAS, CNC, and USNM. DIST: MEXICO (Baja California: Cañón Guadalupe; Jalisco: San José del Castillo; Sonora; Tamaulipas: Victoria).Also CANADA (Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan) and UNITED STATES (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wyoming). Map: Valley & Berg 1977 FIGS: Fisher & Orth 1983 (♂ habitus, head, ♂ terminalia, hypandrial process; ♀ sternites of three “forms”), Orth 1991 (hypandrial process) BIOL: Mc Donnell et al. 2007. BG: 11; PG: 6? HOSTS/PREY OF LARVAE: Lymnaea sp. IMMATS: Fisher & Orth 1983 (L3) Note: “Fisher & Orth (1983) consider D. montana a polytypic species which can be separated into four forms by differences in size, male and female terminalia, and, often, by patterns of distribution” (Orth 1991)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".