MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930852700 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2543591

Sport training in schools in volleyball

2019· article· en· W6930852700 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Training Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical educationPreparednessRecreationTest (biology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Physical cultureFootballBasketball

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<em>Volleyball is one of the main and integral parts of the content of physical education lessons and optional classes, physical education and recreational activities and sports activities in the school day, extra-curricular work on the physical education of schoolchildren. It is difficult to find a collective of physical culture, in which there would be no volleyball section. Properly organized volleyball lessons are a good method for the comprehensive physical development of schoolchildren who are involved and contribute to the decision of important educational tasks. <strong>Purpose</strong>: Improvement of the methodology of preparation of students of lyceum at volleyball classes. <strong>Material and methods</strong>: the study was conducted with high school students of the Kherson Physico-Technical Lyceum in the study of the Volleyball module. Training and improvement of the lyceum students' volleyball techniques was conducted in academic classes in physical culture during January-March 2018. The duration of each class is 80 minutes. The level of technical preparedness of high school students was studied and compared by four test exercises and the basics of knowledge on the history and rules of the game of volleyball were assessed. <strong>Results</strong>: showed that the high rates in ball passes for girls (by 25%) and for boys (by 8.5%) changed for the better. A high level improvement took place in boys (by 13.5%) and in girls (by 12.5%) in ball</em> <em>pitches. Significantly changed the performance of high school students for the performance of the attack hit and the ball from the bottom. The high rates improved by a quarter among girls (25%) and by a third among boys (31% and 31.5%, respectively). The fact that there are almost no low rates (with the exception of ball feeds for girls -12.5%) speaks in favor of the efficiency of the applied technique. The high rates of knowledge of the basics of volleyball for girls improved by 22.5% in contrast to the previous ones, and sufficient indicators also improved by 33.5%. <strong>Conclusions</strong>: the effectiveness of this technique is proved by the students improving the technique of performing all the elements of volleyball. This can be associated with the successful development of certain theoretical knowledge of volleyball by high school students</em>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPhysical Education and Training StudiesFrench-language works237,207