MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6930956037 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15603354

Plukenetia polyadenia Mull. Arg.

2020· article· en· W6930956037 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetics and Plant Breeding
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHerbariumBarcodeNomenclatureInflorescenceType (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

22. PLUKENETIA POLYADENIA Müll.Arg. in Martius (ed.), Fl. Bras. 11 (2): 334. 1874. Elaeophora polyadenia (Müll.Arg.) Ducke, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 5: 146. 1930. TYPE: PERU. Maynas, E.F. Poeppig 2385 (lectotype designated here: G! [barcode G00441993]; isolectotypes: F! [fragment], W [photo at F!]; likely isolectotypes (mislabeled as E.F. Poeppig 2585): HAL [barcode HAL0140191; image!], NY! [barcode 00273181]). Elaeophora abutifolia Ducke, Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 4: 112. 1925. Plukenetia abutifolia (Ducke) Pax & K.Hoffm. in Engler & Prantl (eds.), Nat. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 19c: 141. 1931. TYPE: BRAZIL. Pará: Breves Antonio Lemos, margem inundada do Rio Tajapuru, 5 May 1923, A. Ducke s.n. (lectotype designated here: RB [accession 17893, barcode 00283479; image!]; isolectotypes: G [barcode G00441992; image!], IAN [accession 50621, barcode IAN05061; image!], K [barcode K000600770; image!], P! [barcode P00645482], S [barcode S-R-10641; image!], U [barcode U 0002066; image!], US [accession 1442272, barcode 01105949; image!]). Notes —See Gillespie (1993) for species discussion and Gillespie and Armbruster (1997) for species description. There is sufficient ambiguity over the type of P. polyadenia to warrant designating a lectotype. The specimen at G, where Muller worked, is limited to a single leaf and inflorescence fragment, suggesting the detailed type description was based on additional material. Three specimens of E.F. Poeppig 2385 reported on the Vienna Virtual Herbarium (https://herbarium. univie.ac.at; last accessed 28 November 2019) are likely candidates given that Poeppig’ s types are often housed at W (Stafleu and Cowan 1983), however at the time of writing we were unable to access the specimens to make an assessment. In this situation, we designate a lectotype based on the only specimen that we were able to verify, housed at G. Of the three syntypes cited in the protologue of Elaeophora abutifolia, A. Ducke s.n., RB 17893 has the best floral material. Overall, the U specimen (now housed at L) most clearly demonstrates the pistillate morphology, but by convention we lectotypify the original syntype housed in Ducke’ s herbarium at the Jardim Botanico do Rio de Janeiro. Remaining syntypes: BRAZIL. Para` ı: Bele`ım Marutucu` ı, capoeira u`ımida, 18 October 1923, A. Ducke s.n. (RB [accession 17892, barcode 00283480; image!]); SaÞo Fe`ılix do Xingu Estrada da Victo`ırio ao Forte, 21 April 1924, J.G. Kuhlmann 2051 (RB [accession 17895, barcode 00724931; image!], RB [barcode 00287343; image!], S [accession S-R-10855; image!], U! [barcode U 0002067]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGenetics and Plant BreedingFrench-language works237,207