Charadra tapa Schmidt & Anweiler 2010, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charadra tapa Schmidt & Anweiler, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 00370BBD-8B85-4AA1-A8AB-9AF7D6CB7FE2 Figs 8, 9, 24, 31 Type material. Holotype ♁ – UNITED STATES. “AZ; Cochise Co. / Huachuca Mts, 5354 Ash / Cyn [Canyon] Rd. 0.5miW [0.5 miles west of] Hwy [Highway] 92 / 15.IX.1992 5100’ / N. McFarland UV light”; “ HOLOTYPE / C haradra tapa / Schmidt & Anweiler” [red label]. Deposited in CNC. Paratypes – 21 ♁, 9 ♀ [CNC, CUIC, USNM, UASM]. Same data as holotype (all reared ex ova on Quercus gambelii), 5 Oct 1959 (1 ♁); 15 Aug 1965 (1 ♁); 27 Aug. 1965 (1 ♀); United States: Arizona: Cochise Co., Huachuca Mountains, Ramsey Canyon., R. F. Sternitzky, 2 Oct. 1967 (3 ♁, 1 ♀), 13 Sept. 1967 (1 ♁), 25 Sep 1967 (1 ♁), 29 Oct. 1967 (3 ♁, 1♀), 24 Sept. 1967 (1 ♀); Cochise Co., Huachuca Mountains, Carr Canyon., R. F. Sternitzky, 28 Sep 1967, (1♀), 24 Sep 1967 (3 ♁), 28 Sep 1967 (2 ♁); Cochise Co., Sierra Vista, F. Sternitzky, 8 Sept. 1967, (1 ♁), 25 Sept. 1967 (1 ♁), 18 Sep 1966 (1 ♀); Cochise Co., Huachuca Mtns, Garden Cyn., F. Sternitzky, 9 Oct. 1967, (1 ♁); Cochise Co., Huachuca Mtns, 5354 Ash Canyon. Rd. 0.5 mi W Hwy. 92, 15 Sept. 1992, 5100’, N. McFarland, (1 ♁), 22 Sep 1992 (1 ♀), 24 Sep 1992 (1 ♁), 21 Sep 1992 (1 ♁); Cochise Co., Chiracahua Mtns, Southwestern Research Station, 21 May 1960, C.W. Kirkwood (1 ♀); Santa Cruz Co., Santa Rita Mtns, Madera Canyon, 4880’, 1 Oct. 1959, (1 ♀), 14 Aug 1965 (1 ♁), J.G. Franclemont. Etymology. The name tapa is an anagram of pata. Diagnosis. Most similar to C. franclemonti; see diagnosis under that species. Description. Sexes externally alike, except females slightly larger than males. FW length averages 18 mm in males, 19 mm in females. Head, thorax, abdomen – as for C. franclemonti, with following differences in wing markings: Forewings slightly paler grey overall, particularly distal third; medial dark area slightly paler; hindwing with slightly paler yellowish base, dark marginal band on average slightly wider than in C. franclemonti. Male genitalia (Fig. 24) – structurally very similar to that of C. franclemonti, with following differences: valve tip slightly more triangular (more squared in C. franclemonti); base of vesica with two large, thorn-like cornuti positioned adjacent to each other on left-sublateral area. Female genitalia (Fig. 31) – as in C. franclemonti, with following differences: antevaginal plate with broad Ushaped medial notch and two short, broadly-rounded triangular lobes, not extending beyond margin of sternum; ductus bursae with a more pronounced ventral twist of right lateral margin. Distribution and biology. The known distribution of C. tapa is limited to the Chiricahua, Huachuca, and Santa Rita Mountains of southeastern Arizona, although the species probably occurs in adjacent parts of Mexico. Th e main flight period is from September to October; a single specimen from early May indicates there may be spring flight. Larvae have been reared on Gambel Oak (Quercus gambelii). Remarks. Although previously treated as such, neither C. tapa nor C. franclemonti is referable to C. pata, as pointed out in the ‘remarks’ section of C. pata.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".