MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931044155 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4465106

Polynema (Polynema) aristokratka Triapitsyn 2021, sp. n.

2021· article· en· W6931044155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypePedicelSeasoningScapeParatype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polynema (Polynema) aristokratka Triapitsyn, sp. n. (Figs 28–33) Polynema sp.: Noyes & Valentine 1989: 46 (in part). Type material. Holotype female [NZAC] on slide (Fig. 29) labeled: 1. “ NEW ZEALAND CO Watts Rock, 1200 m, Jan 1981 ”; 2. “ Tussock /grasses, Juncus, Sphagnum ”; 3. “ Swept J. S. Noyes, E. W. Valentine ”; 4. “E1273”; 5. [yellow] “ N.Z. Arthropod Collection, NZAC, Private Bag 92170, AUCKLAND, New Zealand ”; 6. “ Mounted at UCR/ERM by V. V. Berezovskiy 2006 in Canada balsam”. The holotype is in good condition except one fore leg is missing, dissected under 3 coverslips. Paratypes: same data as the holotype [1♀ on slide, NZAC and 5♀ on cards, NZAC (4), UCRC (1)]. The type locality is on South Island. Description. FEMALE (holotype). Body mostly dark brown except pronotum brown and petiole light brown; scape and pedicel light brown, funicle brown, clava dark brown; legs light brown except apical tarsomeres brown. Head (Fig. 31) about as high as wide. Antenna (Fig. 28) with scape, including short radicle, 2.6× as long as wide and with inconspicuous cross-ridges; pedicel smooth, longer than any funicular and 1.9× as long as wide; F1 the shortest and F2 the longest funiculars, F4 about as long as F5 and slightly shorter than F3 or F6, length to width ratios of funiculars: F1—1.7, F2—3.9; F3—3.5; F4—2.4; F5—2.1; F6—2.2, all funiculars without mps; clava 3.2× as long as wide, about as long as combined length of 3 preceding flagellomeres, with 6 mps. Mesosoma (as in Fig. 30) about 1.5× as long as wide; mesonotum mostly smooth except pronotum with mesh-like sculpture; pronotum undivided, long; mesoscutum and scutellum fused (as in Fig. 32), mesoscutum without notauli (only with anterior pits) and scutellum without frenal foveae, the single campaniform sensillum close to lateral and posterior margins of scutellum (the other sensillum of the usual pair absent), frenum very short; propodeum with a short, incomplete median carina at posterior margin (as in Fig. 32). Apterous (as in Fig. 33). Metacoxa smooth, shorter than petiole. Petiole about 2.2× as long as wide, with lateral “wings” anteriorly. Ovipositor occupying almost 0.9 length of gaster (as in Fig. 30), exserted beyond gastral apex by about 0.05× total length of ovipositor, and 1.5× length of metatibia. Measurements of the holotype (µm). Mesosoma: 267; petiole: 85; gaster: 342; ovipositor: 303. Scape: 82; pedicel: 58; F1: 20; F2: 54; F3: 42; F4: 36; F5: 36; F6: 42; clava: 117. Variation (dry-mounted paratypes, Fig. 33). Body length 590–660 µm. Scutellum with campaniform sensilla very wide apart, close to its lateral and posterior margins. MALE. Unknown. Diagnosis. Polynema aristokratka and P. markiza are the only completely wingless species described in Polynema s.l.; their females can be easily distinguished by the absence of a frenal row of foveae in P. aristokratka (Fig. 32) and its presence in P. markiza (Figs 119–120). In addition, the mesoscutum is fused to the scutellum in P. aristokratka (Fig. 32) and distinctly defined in P. markiza (Fig. 119). Polynema aristokratka also has a notably shorter propodeal carina than P. markiza (Figs 32 and 120, respectively). Etymology. The species name is a noun in apposition; it means female aristocrat in Russian. Remarks. Noyes & Valentine (1989: 46) mentioned an unusual, apterous species “with an almost cylindrical thorax, elongate pronotum, and reduced mesoscutum and scutellum”—E.W. Valentine considered this species and what is described here as P. markiza to be conspecific and identified and labeled them both on 11.vi.1981 as a Barypolynema sp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207