REHOUSE public report: Technical diagnosis (SRI, energy performance, air quality) initial status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: This public REHOUSE report D4.2 presents the results of Task 4.2 “DIAGNOSIS - Technical diagnosis (baseline) of current buildings status and energy systems” from Work Package (WP) 4 “Demonstration of the 8 renovation packages (TRL7)” in the Horizon Europe project REHOUSE. All the WP4 tasks works towards the aim to demonstrate the 8 Renovation Packages innovative solutions at TRL7 in the 4 demo-sites, from the deployment of a digital building logbook (T4.1), continuing with the process of the diagnosis of the buildings (T4.2), the design and preparation phases (T4.3), the construction phase (T4.4), the operational phase (T4.5) and by ending with the evaluation of the performance of the solutions under real conditions (T4.6). More specifically, D4.2, entitled “Technical diagnosis (SRI, energy performance, air quality) initial status”, presents the starting point of the four demo-sites of the REHOUSE project before the retrofit and it defines the baseline situation for the four demo-sites, so that the evaluation of the final performance, as defined in WP3 “Measurement, Evaluation and Learning methodology, impact assessment and platform specifications”, can be implemented. The document is structured in 8 chapters: After the introduction in chapter 1, chapter 2 presents the link with measurement and evaluation methodology as defined in WP3 in which T3.2 “Establishment of the REHOUSE set of indicators” identified and defined the project KPIs and T3.4 “Monitoring programmes/plans” which defined the monitoring programs for each demo-site, including the baseline monitoring needs. Detailed information about the previous tasks (T3.2 and T3.4) outcomes can be found under D3.2 “REHOUSE set of indicators selected for the impact assessment” and D3.4 “Monitoring programmes for the 4 demos”. The other chapters define the initial conditions of the demo-sites throughout different axes. Chapter 3 gives a global assessment of the buildings for each demo-site regarding the existing conditions, facilities and infrastructures collected through a defined questionnaire. Chapter 4 presents the assessment of the SRI initial level for each site. Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 present the energy performance and thermal comfort and indoor air quality initial status respectively for each demo-site. Finally, Chapter 7 presents the methodology followed by the Italian demo-site for the building structural diagnosis due to their seismic implications. In the Annex of the report it is possible to see the results of the application of the methodology presented in Chapter 7 to the Italian demo-site and the Questionnaire used for the data collection and the analysis shown in Chapter 3. Further public reports of the REHOUSE project: Publications – REHOUSE
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.172 | 0.184 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".