MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931061244 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4401255

Paragrallomyia vulpes Ferro & Marshall 2020, new combination

2020· article· en· W6931061244 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaVulpesFemurClawRib cageThorax (insect anatomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paragrallomyia vulpes (Cresson, 1926) new combination (Figs. 53–56) Taeniaptera vulpes Cresson 1926: 273, Cresson 1930: 313, Hennig 1934: 85, Jackson et al. 2015: 15. Paragrallomyia vulpes (Cresson), new combination. Description: Body length 6 mm; wing 4 mm. Head orange brown, thorax and abdomen black. Palpus orange brown. Clypeus brown with sparse pale microsetulae. First flagellomere brown. Frontal vitta uniformly orange brown, without a darkened spot anterior to ocellar plate. Fronto-orbital plate yellowish-brown. Row of katepisternal setae brownish. Fore tibia dark brown. Fore tarsus mostly white, tarsomere one brown on basal half only. Hind femur mostly dark brown, white on basal quarter and with a small angled preapical white ring. Tergites black. Oviscape dark brown. Head: First flagellomere covered by pale microsetulae. Frontal vitta flat, not swollen anterior to ocellar plate. Epicephala converging, not immediately merging posterior to ocellar plate (Fig. 53). Epicephalon somewhat swollen above frontal vitta level. Thorax: Mesonotum with lines of thin brownish microsetulae. Anterior half of postpronotal lobe with three or four strong black setae. Femur covered with sparse brown microsetulae. Mid and hind tibia cylindrical, without sulcus on outer face. Cervical sclerite with a whitish oval swelling. Cell r 4+5 closed at the tip of the wing. Abdomen: Pleural membrane dark brown, P3 with a white vertical stripe. Female abdomen: Single spermathecal duct smooth and with a rounded apical swelling. Single spermatheca cylindrical and unusually large, almost same length and about 1.5x thicker than the single spermathecal duct (Fig. 54). Paired spermathecal duct apically broad on apical half. Paired spermathecal duct stems smooth and tapered on basal third, slightly broadening on apical two thirds. Paired spermathecae spine-like, broad basally and slightly tapering to the apex. Male abdomen: Copulatory fork without inner basal lobes (Fig. 55). Ejaculatory apodeme bigger than epandrium and with a broad blade, bigger than sperm pump (Fig. 56). Phallapodeme short, not extending to anterior limit of hypandrium. Distiphallus long, longer than epandrium, phallic bulb subequal in length and width. Distal distiphallus short and thin, 1/4 of length and almost half of width of basal distiphallus. Type material: Holotype of Taeniaptera vulpes: PANAMA. Trinidad Rio. 18.III.1912. A. Busck coll. (1 ♂, USNM27079). Examined material: COSTA RICA. 5 km E Cahuita. 29.X.1993. A. Borkent CD1641 (2 #f, DEBU01088984, CNC); Heredia, 5 km W Trinidad, jct Rio San Juan & Sarapiqui, 50 m. 15.VIII.1995. J. M. Cumming (2 ♂, CNC); La Selva Research Station, 10º25’52.29”N 84º0’23.66”W, 68 m, 30-31.VII.2013, J. H., A. M. and A.W. Skevington (1 ♂, JSS 26383 and JSM5273, CNC); Limon, delta, Rio San Juan. II.1991. M. Wood (1 ♀, 7 ♂, DEBU01088983, CNC). Distribution: Colombia, Costa Rica, Panama. Comments: Although previous authors have treated this species as Taeniaptera, molecular data (unpublished) and the characteristic hyaline path around crossvein r-m (Fig. 55) strongly suggests that it belongs in Paragrallomyia. Records of this species from Brazil (Ferro & Carvalho 2014) are misidentifications and represent one or more undescribed species. Brazilian specimens previously identified as T. vulpes lack white basal rings on the mid and hind femur, therefore do not belong in the albibasis complex as defined here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207