MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931072196 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15205238

A proposal to change from New Public Management (UK) to New Public Service (US) after the BREXIT

2025· article· en· W6931072196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic serviceNew public managementLanguage changeOrder (exchange)Civil societyDemocracyCollective intelligenceService (business)CentralisationBest practice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Withdrawal Agreement concluded between the European Union and the United Kingdom opened space to change from the English model of Public Administration management to the American model in order to avoid the growth of communism via authoritarian governments. According to several scholars, the New Public Management - NPM, English model, has an emphasis on management by results and performance assessment, using quantitative indicators to measure the efficiency of public services, marked by the adoption of management practices inspired by the private sector, promoting an individualistic vision of society, generating high levels of corruption (isolation of the knowledge in the top of the public administration along with government). The proposed American model, the New Public Service - NPS, "questions existing power structures and promotes a more equitable distribution of knowledge and decision-making. This means creating mechanisms for the democratic participation of organized civil society which leads to greater social control social and effectiveness of public projects. This article proposes a review of the NPS model through knowledge creation and sharing practices (Knowledge Management - KM), as well as knowledge analysis (Organizational Intelligence - OI) and application practices (Cultural Intelligence - CI). The work concludes that KM, OI and CI are the missing elements for the NPS to replace the NPM as it drastically reduces the avalanche of information and brings relevant collective knowledge, especially for public policies that directly impact the relationship between government, companies and society and therefore reduce corruption and the overload of American Giants, the weakest elements of the capitalism. In order to understand the impact of culture on knowledge and intelligence, in addition to the impact of knowledge itself on intelligence, this work uses interview methodology - National Autonomous University of Mexico and Tecnologico de Monterrey - and one University in United States - Michigan University - and uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the relationships between constructs. In addition to a robust literature review, the main conclusion is that the low level of cultural intelligence in countries colonized by England, based on knowledge and not intelligence (application of knowledge), leads to economic dependence, such as Canada's relations with the United States and Australia with New Zealand, in addition to Nigeria with South Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0250.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→