MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931086222 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15635315

Cercyon (Cercyon) praetextatus

2020· article· en· W6931086222 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Statistical analysisDeposition (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cercyon (Cercyon) praetextatus (Say, 1825) Sphaeridium praetextatum Say, 1825: 190. Cercyon praetextatum (Say): Melsheimer, 1853: 37. For complete synonymy see Smetana (1978) and Hansen (1999). Material examined: BRAZIL: Paraná: Colombo: “ COLOMBO - PR / EMBRAPA BR 476 km 20/ BRASIL 30. I. 1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” (1 ex.: DZUP); Guarapuava: “Guarapuava - Paraná / Est. Águas Sta. Clara/ BRAZIL 02. XII.1986 / Lev.Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” (2 exs.: DZUP); same data, different dates, all specimens deposited in DZUP: “ 03. XII. 1986 ” (1 ex.); “ 31.XII.1986 ” (1 ex.); “ 27.I.1987 ” (1 ex.); “ 28.I.1987 ” (1 ex.); “ 31. I.1987 ” (1 ex.); “ 26.II.1987 ” (1 ex.); “ 27.III.1987 ” (1 ex.); Fênix: “FÊNIX - PARANÁ / Reserva Est - ITCF/ BRASIL 27.I.1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” (1 ex.: DZUP); same data, different date: “ 29.III.1987 ” (1 ex.: DZUP); Jundiaí do Sul: “JUNDIAÍ DO SUL - PR / Fazenda Monte Verde/ BRASIL 30. XI. 1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” (3 ex.: DZUP); same data, different dates, all specimens deposited in DZUP: “ 01. I. 1987 ” (2 exs.); “ 28. II. 1987 ” (1 ex.); 31.III. 1987 ” (1 ex.); Telêmaco Borba: “TELÊMACO BORBA - PR / Res. Samuel Klabin/ BRASIL 31. XII. 1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” (2 exs.: DZUP); same data, different dates, all specimens deposited in DZUP: “ 27. I. 1987 ” (1 ex.); “ 01. III. 1987 ” (1 exs.); “ 25. II. 1987 ” (1 exs.). Discussion. This species is widely distributed in North and Central America – with occurrence in Canada, USA, Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Dominican Republic and Jamaica (Smetana, 1978; Hansen, 1999; Arriaga-Varela et al., 2017). Cercyon praetextatus was recorded as introduced in Argentina by d’Orchymont (1939) based on specimens collected around Buenos Aires (Tigre). Fikácek (2009) confirmed the occurrence and the hypothesis that the species is introduced in Argentina based on specimens from Entre Rios Province (Colón). The author pointed out that the species seems likely to be native in the northern part of the Neotropical Region. Cercyon praetextatus is herein recorded for the very first time in Brazil as a widely distributed species in Paraná State. According to this distribution, seems likely the species was introduced in the “Southern Cone” of Latin America but we cannot rule out the possibility of a natural wide distribution in the New World, since Sphaeridiinae have been neglected in South American biodiversity studies and the missing of records of Cercyon throughout the continent may be consequence of the lacking of collecting and taxonomic works focused in the group. The species is easily recognizable by the moderate small size (body length 2.4–4.1 mm); dorsal coloration with head dark-brown to black, pronotum dark-brown to black (in all examined specimens) sometimes with sharply defined yellowish to reddish areas at anterolateral corners or at lateral margins (Smetana, 1978; Arriaga-Varela et al., 2017), elytra dark-brown to black with large sharply-defined yellowish to reddish-yellow lateroapical area reaching about apical fourth, laterally reaching elytral base in lateralmost interval, yellow spot not extended to humeral area basally; medial ridge of prosternum anteriorly forming a small rounded to slightly pointed process; mesoventral plate wide (ca. 3× as long as wide); and the conspicuous male genitalia. For more detailed information on the morphology and illustrations of the species see Smetana (1978) and Arriaga-Varela et al. (2017). Bionomics. All the examined specimens were collected with light traps but according to with Smetana (1978) the species seems to prefer primarily wet environments (such as edges of lakes and streams, marshes, wet deciduous forests, etc.) and can be found on many kinds of organic debris, leaf-litter, decomposing plant remnants, carrion, and dung.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207