MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931095837 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3665054

Rudolfina pauca Paiero & Marshall 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6931095837 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet, Metabolism, and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeRothschildEtymologyEmperorMesoamerica

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rudolfina pauca sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: F085E96F-6CCB-49B0-83B8-503F18F1B472 Figs 16–17, 21C Etymology The species name is the Latin for ‘few’. Compared to the closely related R. exuberata sp. nov., which occurs throughout the Neotropical region and has been collected at over a hundred different sites, R. pauca sp. nov. has been infrequently collected and remains known from only five sites in Mexico and Guatemala. Material examined Holotype MEXICO • ♂; México, 1 mi. NE of Tenancingo; 7100 ft a.s.l.; 31 Aug.–6 Sep. 1971; A. Newton leg.; oak-pine-madrono, human dung; FMNH debu01086244. Paratypes GUATEMALA – San Marcos • 1 ♀; San Antonio Sacatepéquez; 14°58′ N, 91°44′ W; 8000 ft a.s.l.; 29 Sep. 1986; M.J. Sharkey leg.; DEBU. MEXICO – Hidalgo • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; 4 mi. W of Tulancingo; 7600 ft a.s.l.; 1–6 Jul. 1971; A. Newton leg.; human dung; DEBU. – México • 6 ♂♂, 10 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; FMNH • 8 ♂♂, 10 ♂♂; same collection data as for holotype; DEBU • 2 ♀♀; 3 mi. SW of Tenancingo, at km 52¼; 7100 ft a.s.l.; 31 Aug.–6 Sep. 1971; A. Newton leg.; oak-juniper, human dung; DEBU • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; UNAM. – Morelos • 1 ♀; 8 mi. S of Tres Cumbres; 7400 ft a.s.l.; 29 Aug.–4 Sep. 1971; A. Newton leg.; oak/pine forest, dung; DEBU. Description BODY. Length: 1.4–1.9 mm. Eye height 1.3 × genal height. Head with 4 interfrontal setae and row of 8–10 small setulae on inner margin of orbital plate. Gena with 1 strong seta and 8 smaller setulae. Acrostichal setulae in 6–8 rows. Costagial seta extending to humeral break; second costal sector shorter than third (20:35); length of M 1 between crossveins dm-cu and r-m 1.2 × dm-cu; CuA 1 stub vein ~2.0 × M 1 stub vein. Male mid femur with 4–5 weak setae in ventrobasal cluster. Male mid tibia with ventral comb of 11–13 robust setae on apical ½. MALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 16). Sternites 3–4 evenly haired. Posterior margin of sternite 5 with lobes elongate, projecting posteriorly; emargination extending anteriorly ~¼ length of sternite, ~¼ width of sternite at posterior margin. Transverse part of sternite 6 weakly arcuate. Epandrium with 2 long ventrolateral setae and scattered setulae; subanal plate narrowly continuous below anal opening. Surstylus (in lateral view) trilobed, with anterior lobe rounded and bare, middle lobe small, rounded and with 4–6 distal setae apically, and posterior lobe posteriorly projecting and rounded, with 1 large, flattened seta and 2–3 regular setae apically. Cercus small and conical, projecting posterolaterally, with 2 apical setae. Postgonite slightly capitate or oar-shaped, with apex ventrally emarginate; 3–4 setulae present along dorsal surface. Dorsal sclerite of distiphallus (Fig. 16 D–F) without swellings and not extending beyond apex of acrophallus. FEMALE ABDOMEN (Fig. 17). Posterior margin of tergite 7 medially emarginate. Medial part of tergite 8 elongate, rectangular (length ~3.0× width) and poorly sclerotized; overlapping basal projection of epiproct. Epiproct tulip-shaped, with elongate narrow anterior extension. Cercus reduced, shorter than apical flattened seta; fused anterolaterally to epiproct. Spermathecae acorn-shaped, with a small, smooth distal bulb, a wrinkled medial section and a smooth basal section; paired spermathecae with stems as long as spermatheca; common duct of pair short, ~1/6 length of stems. Remarks See comments under R. exuberata sp. nov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiet, Metabolism, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207