Neodexiopsis paulistensis Albuquerque 1956
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neodexiopsis paulistensis Albuquerque, 1956 Distribution. Brazil. BRAZIL, Minas Gerais, Nova Lima, -19.9856, -43.8467 (Couri & Albuquerque 1979); Paraná, Campo do Tenente, -25.9781, -49.6828 (DZUP); Paraná, Castro, -24.7911, -50.0119 (DZUP); Paraná, Morretes, -25.4769, -48.8344 (DZUP); Paraná, Tijucas do Sul, -25.9281, -49.1989 (MNRJ); Rio de Janeiro, Angra dos Reis, -23.0067, -44.3181 (Couri & Albuquerque 1979); Rio de Janeiro, Embariê, Duque de Caxias, -22.7856, -43.3117 (DZUP); Rio de Janeiro, Nova Friburgo, -22.2819, -42.5311 (Albuquerque 1956d); Rio de Janeiro, Petrópolis, -22.5050, -43.1786 (Couri & Albuquerque 1979); Rio de Janeiro, Teresópolis, -22.4122, -42.9656 (Albuquerque 1956d); Rio Grande do Sul, Arroio Grande, -32.2228, -53.1992 (Duarte et al. 2010, Krüger et al. 2010); Rio Grande do Sul, Capão do Leão, -31.8044, -52.4036 (Krüger et al. 2010); Rio Grande do Sul, Morro Redondo, -31.6728, -52.5917 (Krüger et al. 2010); Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas, -31.7442, -52.2228 (Duarte et al. 2010); São Paulo, Cantareira, -23.4667, - 46.6333 (Couri & Albuquerque 1979); São Paulo, Serra da Bocaina, -22.6836, -44.3233 (Albuquerque 1956d).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".