Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>55.1. Larentiinae – carpet moths</i> Medium-sized moths (approximately 15–35 mm wingspan) with complex patterns of transverse bands. Th ey can be separated from other geometrids by wing venation: on the hindwing, the Sc + R 1 veins are fused with the Rs vein for more than one-quarter the length of the discal cell. No other easily observable characters define the group. Larvae of most species feed on the foliage of trees; a few species of <i>Eupithecia</i> in Hawaii are carnivorous on aphids and spiders. Th e Larentiinae includes a few forest pest species such as the winter moths (<i>Operophtera</i> spp.). Approximately 5700 species of Larentiinae are known worldwide, primarily from temperate regions. Approximately 470 species occur in North America; 137 are known from AB. Th is subfamily is in need of taxonomic work, and many specimens in collections have not been adequately identified because of the diffi culty in making species determinations. Some groups are reasonably well known, including <i>Anticlea</i> (Rindge 1967), some <i>Dysstroma</i> (McDunnough 1946a), <i>Entephria</i> (Troubridge 1997), <i>Eubaphe</i> (Fletcher 1954), Canadian <i>Eupithecia</i> (Bolte 1990), some <i>Hydriomena</i> (McDunnough 1954), <i>Operophtera</i> (Troubridge and Fitzpatrick 1993), <i>Plemyria</i> (Choi 1998), and <i>Rheumaptera</i> (Skou 1986). McGuffi n (1958b) treated the known larvae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".