Bibliographic record
Abstract
pubera (Loew), 1862: 106–107 (Sciomyza) [Cresson 1920: 40] LT: ♂ United States, “Middle States.” MCZC, No. 13208 [Examined LK 1977 in Knutson et al. 1986: 45] DIST: GUATEMALA (Alta Verapaz; Sacatepéquez). MEXICO (Chiapas; Ciudad de México; Durango: Navios; Hidalgo: Tulancingo; México; Michoacán: Morelia; Tamaulipas). Also CANADA (Ontario) and UNITED STATES. Map: Foote et al. 1960 Note: One of the Guatemalan specimens is labeled “La Providencia, Obispo.” This is likely San Juan del Obispo in the department of Sacatepéquez. The holotype and paratypes of Thecomyia chrysacra were collected at the same locality. We present an analysis of the their provenance under T. chrysacra. FIGS: Wulp 1897 (head, as Sciomyza squalens Wulp), Fisher & Orth 1983 (habitus, head, ♂ terminalia), Marinoni & Mathis 2000 (antenna, ♂ terminalia, ♂ genitalia), this paper (habitus, proepisternal seta, antenna, thoracic pleura, fore legs, wing, pharyngeal sclerite, posterior spiracular disc) BIOL: Foote et al. 1960. BG: 1; PG: 1 HOSTS/PREY OF LARVAE: Two males in the CUIC are labeled, “ MEXICO: México, Chapingo: ENA Expt. Fields, 1325 m., col. 11.VIII.1969, pup. 17.VIII.1969, emer. 26.VIII.1969. K. Valley.” Shells of large Haitia (family Physidae), one containing the puparium, are pinned with each adult. In North America: freshwater (four genera) and terrestrial (four genera) pulmonate snails [“ … eggs, larvae and puparia found on/in Stagnicola elodes, Helisoma anceps, Helisoma trivolvis, Physella gyrina, Aplexa hypnorum, Oxyloma decampi… Apparently the larvae are associated with an ecological assemblage of snails and not with any particular taxonomic group” (Foote et al. 1960)]. Also puparia of A. pubera were collected on one valve of a large dead freshwater clam (Lampsilis sp., family Unionidae) on a lakeshore, indicating that larvae apparently were feeding saprophagously (J.B. Keiper, pers. comm. to LK). This is the only Sciomyzidae known to feed on dead Unionidae. IMMATS: Foote et al. 1960 (E, L1–L3, P) CHR: Boyes et al. 1969 (karyotype) MOL_DAT: Y squalens Wulp, 1897: 356, pl. 9, fig. 10 (head) (Sciomyza) [Knutson et al. 1976: 3] ST: 7♂ 3♀ Mexico, Mexico City. H.H. Smith. NHMUK. The specimens are labeled lectotype and paralectotype, but no indication is provided as to who labeled them. Apparently the designations have not been published. Examined by LK in 1971. Also one syntype, ZMAN, Wulp Coll., Box No. 7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".