Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key for identification of North American species of Camptocercus. 1 Head and valves without developed dorsal keel................ Camptocercus oklahomensis Mackin, 1930. Central USA. - Head and valves with developed dorsal keel................................................................2 2 Basal spine of postabdominal claw with maximum width at central portion. IDL seta 1 thick, curved, claw-like, longer than IDL seta 2.................................................. Camptocercus streletskayae Smirnov, 1998. Alaska. - Basal spine of postabdominal claw with maximum width at the base. IDL seta 1 thin, almost straight, two times shorter than IDL seta 2.......................................................................................... 3 3 Basal pecten of the postabdominal claw consisting of 1–2 distal spines and over 15 densely spaced, thin spinules; distances between distalmost spines not exceed width of spine bases. Posteroventral angle of valves with 1–5 denticles................................................ Camptocercus rotundus Herrick, 1882. South Canada, North and South-East USA. - Basal pecten of the postabdominal claw consisting of 2–3 large distal spines and about 5–7 smaller spinulae, distances between distalmost spines significantly exceed width of spine bases. Posteroventral angle of valves without denticles........................... Camptocercus dadayi Stingelin, 1913. South-East USA, Mexico, Central and South America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".