MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931223571 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3793048

Oxytelus sculptus Gravenhorst 1806

2008· article· en· W6931223571 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaNova Scotia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaFaunaLatrineMoorlandZoogeographyTemperate climate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxytelus sculptus Gravenhorst, 1806 NOVA SCOTIA: Kings Co.: Kentville, 27.VII.2007, D.H. Webster, at light, (1, DHWC); Kentville, 12.VIII.2007, D.H. Webster, at light, (1, DHWC). This species is newly recorded for Nova Scotia and the Maritime Provinces (Fig. 1). In North America it previously has been reported from British Columbia, California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington on the west coast, and Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, New York, Ontario, and Québec in the eastern portions of the continent (Moore and Legner 1975; Campbell and Davies 1991; Downie and Arnett 1996). Probably originally African in origin, this species is now cosmopolitan being widely distributed in Europe, Africa, North America, temperate south America, Australia, and New Zealand (Herman 2000). Melsheimer (1846: 42) described it under the name of Oxytelus moerens from the United States; however, the earliest record of this species in North America is from latrine excavations in Boston, Massachusetts from ca. 1670 (Bain 1998). It is usually found in open areas such as gardens, pastures, and fields under stones, and in manure and compost (Burakowski et al. 1979). It is abundant in the manure of domestic animals such as cattle, horses, and poultry. It is probable that this cosmopolitan species has been dispersed by human agency in association with the transport of domestic animals (Moore and Legner 1974).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207