Bibliographic record
Abstract
We summarize the current state of probing "fundamental physics" using radio pulsars, rotating neutron stars that emit beamed radiation observed as pulses at radio frequencies, as well as key opportunities for Canadian leadership within the next decade. In the context of pulsar astronomy, fundamental physics mainly concerns open questions in gravitational and nuclear astrophysics, such as the validity of general relativity and nature of nuclear physics in extreme-density environments. (Pulsar astronomy and its applications for the detection of gravitational waves is the subject of the standalone White Paper E055.) Several overarching questions that define the field, each of which are subject to active debate in the global radio-astrophysical community, are summarized as follows: What is the equation of state of ultra-dense matter found within neutron stars? What are the minimum and maximum masses of neutron stars? How fast can neutron stars spin? And in what ways do the distributions of neutron star masses and spin periods reflect the physics of compact stars and different formation channels? What is the correct theory of gravitation in the strong-field regime? How can multi-messenger measurements of neutron stars be used to test gravitation and further elucidate the mystery of their structure? As we discuss in this White Paper for the 2020-2030 Long Range Plan, Canadian scientists are poised to make foundational contributions to the field of pulsar astronomy and its application in studies of fundamental physics. Current and forthcoming radio interferometers developed and built by Canadian researchers are expected to discover and study thousands of pulsars in the Northern sky, most likely including sources in exotic orbital systems. Among these discoveries could be the first pulsars orbiting black holes, whether these black holes are of stellar mass or reside at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, that have long been sought after by observers and theorists alike. The discovery of neutron stars possessing the smallest and largest masses known will place the strongest constraints on viable interior-physics models that are unattainable from laboratory experiment. In order to enable these discoveries, we make the following recommendations: Canada should remain active in the construction, correlator design and implementation for the SKA in a manner that allows for Canadian researchers to take leadership in pulsar science. Funding should be found and allocated to extend the operation of CHIME past its nominal 5-yr observing run. In the context of pulsar science, the extension would provide additional integration times that directly benefit both the pulsar-search and pulsar-timing backends. Broad Canadian support should be provided for the CHORD initiative, which is being designed as a worthy successor to CHIME and its science directives, including pulsar astronomy and its applications to fundamental physics. Canada should consider providing tangible support for the 300-m Arecibo Observatory and 100-m Green Bank Telescope, two premier facilities that both overcame recent funding struggles. As discussed in the White Paper E055 by I. H. Stairs et al., such support may come in the form of either on-site personnel with scientific and/or technical expertise, instrumentation that further enable breakthrough science at both facilities, or the purchasing of telescope time for measurements related to this topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".