Bibliographic record
Abstract
38. Nopoiulus kochii (Gervais, 1847) Iulus Kochii Gervais, 1847. Nopoiulus pulchellus auct., not C.L. Koch (1838). Nopoiulus minutus auct., not Brandt (1841). Blaniulus venustus Meinert, 1868. Nopoiulus breuili Brolemann, 1921. Blaniulus atticus Verhoeff, 1925. Distribution AL, AT, BA, BE, BG, BY, CH, CZ, DE, DK-DEN, EE, ES-BAL, ES-CNY, FI, FR-FRA, GB-GRB, GB- NI, GR-GRC, HR, HU, IE, IT-ITA, IT-SI, LT, LV, LU, MK, NL, NO-NOR, PL, PT-AZO, PT-MDR, RO, RU-KGD, RU-RUC, RU-RUE, RU-RUS, RU-RUW, SB, SE, SI, SK, TR-TUE, UA. Euro-Caucasian, though few records from the W Mediterranean region. – A cosmopolitan species, introduced into North Africa (Egypt), Asia, North and South America and New Zealand. Habitat In Eastern Europe it is characteristically found in swamp woodland but in other forests as well. Found in light soils rich in humus, often in alluvial valleys or sandy areas. Also open grassland, horticultural ground, suburban areas, parks and gardens. Rotting tree stumps, under bark, in manure heaps, under plant pots, in litter and in the soil, once in a mole’s nest. Reported from catacombs, caves and gypsum quarries/chalk pits. Largely synanthropic away from Eastern Europe. There is a report on this species infesting the human intestine (Ertek et al. 2004). Remarks As in the case of Blaniulus guttulatus, records of Iulu s / Blaniulus / Nopoiulus pulchellus had to be treated with caution in making the maps. Errors are possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".