MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931242359 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6277593

Geostiba

2002· article· en· W6931242359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusSpermathecaArthropod mouthpartsAppendageSeta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

15. Geostiba (s. str.) circellaris (Gravenhorst, 1806) (Figs. 21­23; Figs. 1­4 in Assing (2001)) Aleochara circellaris Gravenhorst, 1806: 155. Geostiba (s. str.) circellaris: Benick & Lohse 1974: 112. Geostiba circellaris: Muona 1984: 229. Geostiba (s. str.) circellaris: Assing 2001: 139. Material. CANADA: Newfoundland: ,, S Newfoundland, Rencontre West [47.61°N 56.69°W] (Lindroth), 16.vi.1949 (MZHF). Diagnosis. Geostiba circellaris can be distinguished from other Nearctic species of Geostiba by having large eyes (temple length to eye length ratio 1.6­1.9), pronotal pubescence of type VI, reduced wings, elytra shorter than pronotum (pronotum length to elytron length ratio 1.1), the presence of one medial carina on male abdominal tergum 7 in front of posterior margin, the shape of the aedeagus and spermatheca (Figs. 1­4 in Assing (2001), Figs. 21­23). In North America there is no native species closely related to G. circellaris. Geostiba circellaris is superficially similar to G. impressula in having pronotal pubescence of type VI but can be distinguished from the latter species by having tergum 7 with one medial carina in males and a different shape of spermatheca in females (Fig. 4 in Assing (2001), Figs. 316­317). Description. Length 2.3­2.8 mm. Body reddish brown to brownish black, in some specimens pronotum, elytra and abdominal segments 7­8 lighter, antennae reddish brown to dark brown, legs and mouthparts from brownish yellow to brown. Body parallel­sided. Head as wide as long, surface on disk with fine isodiametric microsculpture, puncturation very fine, distance between punctures equal to 2­4 times their diameter. Temple length to eye length ratio 1.6­1.9. Antennal article 2 longer than article 3, article 4 subquadrate, articles 5­10 transverse, last article longer than 9 and 10 combined. Pronotum as wide as long, width 0.43­0.53 mm, wider than head (pronotal width to head width ratio 1.2); surface on disk with fine isodiametric microsculpture, and fine puncturation, distance between punctures equal to 1­2 times their diameter; pronotal pubescence of type VI. Elytra measured from humeral angle shorter than pronotum (pronotal length to elytral length ratio 1.1), wider than long (1.4), with fine isodiametric microsculpture and fine asperate puncturation, punctures stronger than on pronotum, distance between punctures equals 1­2 times their diameter. Abdominal terga with fine transverse microsculpture, with fine puncturation, puncturation becoming finer towards abdomen apex, on terga 3­5 distance between punctures equals 2­4 times their diameter. Tergum 7 with white edge. In males pronotum with small medial tubercle at posterior margin (some females have very weak tubercle) and medial impression in front, each elytron with a tubercle near scutellum but distant from elytral suture. Male tergum 7 with one short medial carina in front of posterior margin. Male tergum 8 with two weak and short parallel carina in front of middle of convex posterior margin. Male sternum 8 with posterior margin convex, extending posteriorly beyond tergum. Aedeagus as in Figs. 1­3 in Assing (2001). Internal sac of aedeagus with one pair of large diverticula (Figs. 21­22). Posterior margin of female tergum 8 convex. Posterior margin of female sternum 8 distinctly convex, without emargination. Spermatheca as in Fig. 4 in Assing (2001). Distribution. Geostiba circellaris is a widespread Palaearctic species. In the Nearctic region, it is known only from Newfoundland (Muona 1984), where it was introduced from Europe. Contrary to the opinion expressed by Lohse and Smetana (1988) Geostiba impressula (Casey, 1906) is not a synonym of G. circellaris (see discussion for G. impressula). Geostiba circellaris is not known from western North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207