MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931244387 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5197505

Epitrix Foudras 1860

2013· article· en· W6931244387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOptimism, Hope, and Well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)IndusOrange (colour)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Epitrix Foudras, 1860 E. abeillei (Bauduer 1874): TR-A: ADA (Král 1967; Gruev and Döberl 1997; Aslan et al. 1999; Warchałowski 2003) E. atropae Foudras, 1860: TR-A: EZU (Gruev and Döberl 1997; Aslan et al. 1999) E. caucasica Heikertinger, 1950: TR-A: ERZ, EZU (Gruev et al. 1994; Gruev and Döberl 1997; Aslan et al. 1999; Warchałowski 2003) E. dieckmanni Mohr, 1968: TR-A: ISP (Gök et al. 2002; Çilbiroğlu 2003; Gök and Çilbiroğlu 2003, 2005; Gruev and Döberl 2005; Aslan and Gök 2006b) E. hirtipennis (Melsheimer 1847): TR-A: IZM (Gruev and Döberl 1997; Aslan et al. 1999; Warchałowski 2003) Material examined: Mardin (MAR) province: Dara, 1200 m, 13 June 2010, leg. M. Kaplan, 2 specimens. Note: This species is widespread in North America from Canada to Mexico. It was introduced to Europe (Italy) from North America in 1984 and has since spread to Bulgaria, Greece, Syria and Turkey. E. intermedia Foudras, 1860: TR-A: ERZ, EZU, GIR, SAM (Gruev and Döberl 1997; Aslan et al. 1999; Warchałowski 2003; Gruev 2004) E. pubescens (Koch 1803): TR-A: BAL, BIL, DEN, DUZ, ESK, EZU, IST – TR-E: KRK (Gruev and Kasap 1985; Gruev and Döberl 1997; Aslan et al. 1999; Gök and Çilbiroğlu 2003; Gruev 2004; Aslan and Gök 2006b)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207