MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931255891 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4342897

Tylonycteris robustula Thomas 1915

2013· article· en· W6931255891 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)ChinaViet namBambooField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tylonycteris robustula Thomas, 1915 Greater bamboo bat Tylonycteris robustula Thomas, 1915: 227; Upper Sarawak, Borneo. Distribution NE India, Myanmar, Cambodia, Lao PDR, Vietnam, S China to the Philippines, Sulawesi, Sumatra, Java, Bali, Borneo and Ambon Island (Moluccas). Distribution in Lao PDR (Fig. 70): Attapu Province: Houay Pha Camp, Xe Kaman, Dong Ampham NBCA; Nam Kama (Xe Kaman) (ROM collection); Champasak Province: Houay Kadan, Dong Khanthung proposed NBCA (ROM collection); Houaphan Province: Nam Chong, Nam Et NBCA (EBD collection); Khammouan Province: Ban Mouangkhai (Robinson and Webber, 2000); Ban Xam-Kang, Hin Namno NBCA (ROM collection); Ban Houana (CMF field record); Louangnamtha Province: Ban Si Udon (Ban Si-udon), Nam Ha NBCA; Ban Eng (CMF field record); Louangphabang Province: Nam Khan (EBD collection); Ban Sakok, Nam Et NBCA (CMF field record); Phongsali Province: Naten (Ban Naten), Nam Lan Provincial Protected Area (MNHN collection); Phong Saly (Phongsali) (FMNH collection) (specimen likely to be from Ban Makomen (Ban Khomen) see Bangs and Van Tyne, 1931); Vientiane Province: Ban Nathao (CMF field record).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207