MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931321550 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5307734

Cybaeus piazzai Bennett & Copley & Copley 2021, spec. nov.

2021· article· en· W6931321550 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumHolotypeKeelNatural historySeta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cybaeus piazzai Bennett spec. nov. Figs 39–45, 59, 62 Type material. U.S.A.: California: Holotype male. Santa Barbara County, grounds of Santa Barbara Natural History Museum, 7.ii.1967, V.D. Roth (CAS). Paratypes. Ventura. 1♀, “N34 W119” no date, no collector, (AMNH); Santa Barbara. 1♀, N end of Lk. Cachuma, 8.ii.1967, V.D. Roth (CAS); 1♂ 7♀, grounds of Santa Barbara Natural History Museum, 7.ii.1967, V.D. Roth (CAS). Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym honouring the prominent Los Angeles area blues harmonicist Rod Piazza. Diagnosis. The male of C. piazzai spec. nov. is distinguished by the form of the distal and proximal arms of the tegular apophysis; the female by the form of the copulatory ducts (Fig. 45). The males of C. tardatus and C. piazzai spec. nov. (Figs 40, 59) are distinguished by the concave distal prolateral margin of the elongate distal arm of the tegular apophysis (Fig. 40) and the acuminate ventral and dorsal tips of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis (Figs 40, 59) in C. piazzai spec. nov. (versus a short, broad, and angular distal arm [Fig. 48] and the rounded ventral tip and acuminate dorsal tip of the proximal arm [Figs 48, 60] in C. tardatus). The males of C. topanga spec. nov. and C. piazzai spec. nov. can be distinguished by the ventral and dorsal tips of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis being approximately at right angles to each other with the dorsal tip about twice as long as the ventral tip (Figs 40, 59) in C. piazzai spec. nov. (versus the ventral and dorsal tips are oriented in the same direction and of similar lengths (Figs 57, 61) in C. topanga spec. nov.). Furthermore, the dorsal tip of the proximal arm is sharply acuminate in C. piazzai spec. nov. (versus bluntly acuminate in the male of C. topanga spec. nov.). This difference can be difficult to resolve, however, because of the small size of these structures. Distinguishing the females of C. piazzai spec. nov. and C. orarius spec. nov. is discussed under the diagnosis of the latter species. From the other females in the tardatus species group with rounded spermathecal bases (C. tardatus and C. topanga spec. nov.) the female of C. piazzai spec. nov. is distinguished by the posteriorly broadened copulatory ducts which obscure the Bennett’s glands in cleared dorsal view of the vulva (Fig. 45) (versus copulatory ducts of similar narrow diameter throughout their length and not obscuring the Bennett’s glands in dorsal view in C. tardatus [Fig. 51] and C. topanga spec. nov. [Fig. 54]). Description. Ventral tibia I macrosetae variable: 2-1p-2-1p-1p(or 2 or 0). Femora and tibiae lightly banded or not (larger individuals are more likely to have banded legs than are smaller specimens). Male: (n=2). About 30–35 peg setae on anteriorly directed patellar apophysis (Fig. 39). Carinate retrolateral tibial apophysis nearly as long as tibia. Distal arm of tegular apophysis (Fig. 40) very broad, elongate; proximal arm (Figs 40, 59) appearing trifid in ventral view with ventral tip triangular, bluntly acuminate, prolaterally directed; dorsal tip triangular, sharply pointed, basally directed. Measurements (n=2). CL 2.7, 2.9; CW 1.98, 2.10; SL 1.30, 1.33; SW 1.23, 1.33. Holotype larger specimen. Female: (n=9). Atrium (Figs 42, 44) slightly hooded anteriorly with area between atrial openings inverted vase-shaped, widest posteriorly, concave. Copulatory ducts (Figs 42–45) opening into atrium laterally from vulva, contiguous or separated anteriorly, gradually broadening posteriorly, turning anteriorly and narrowing at posterior margin of vulva. Spermathecal heads small dorsal lobes medially on vulva, visible in dorsal view. Stalks narrow, relatively long. Bennett’s glands located dorsolaterally on small, rounded bases. Measurements (n=9). CL 2.13–3.4 (2.6+0.4), CW 1.40–2.30 (1.80+0.30), SL 1.04–1.55 (1.26+0.17), SW 0.99– 1.45 (1.20+0.16). Distribution and natural history. (Fig. 62). Known only from Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties, California. The two males were collected in February.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207